whoami
Retrieve authenticated Canvas user identity to validate a Personal Access Token.
Instructions
Return the authenticated Canvas user (id, name, email). Useful for validating a PAT.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve authenticated Canvas user identity to validate a Personal Access Token.
Return the authenticated Canvas user (id, name, email). Useful for validating a PAT.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, but the description implies a read operation by stating it returns user info. Could add 'read-only' but not critical given simplicity.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences, zero wasted words, front-loaded with key information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, but description enumerates returned fields (id, name, email). Complete for a tool of this simplicity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so no additional information needed. Baseline 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns the authenticated Canvas user's id, name, and email, which is distinct from any sibling tools that return data about courses, assignments, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicitly mentions usefulness for validating a PAT, providing a clear context for when to use. No explicit when-not, but no sibling alternatives exist.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Abhinav-ranish/Canvas-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server