Skip to main content
Glama
Abhi5h3k

MCP-Email-Verify

by Abhi5h3k
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP-Email-Verify

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • email

      eleanorreem
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Claude Desktop to manage emails via SMTP and IMAP. Send emails, fetch unread messages, and create draft replies directly from conversations.
      3
      20
      MIT

    • mcp-email-sender

      AMEOBIUS-space
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI agents to validate email addresses and send emails via SMTP with zero external dependencies.
      MIT

    • Gmail MCP Server

      AlexHramovich
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Claude Desktop to interact with Gmail through secure OAuth 2.0 authentication. Send emails, search messages, read emails, and manage multiple Gmail accounts directly from Claude Desktop.
      81
      MIT

    • communication-mcp-server

      ajaysingh16601
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides email communication tools (send email, health check, list providers) via SMTP, accessible over HTTP/SSE for remote AI clients like Claude Desktop.
      25
      MIT

    • routine-mcp

      rskmanz
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server built with the mcp-framework for developing and managing custom tools. It provides a structured foundation for building and integrating modular components like data processors and API clients into Claude Desktop.
      5
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single verify_email tool has a clearly distinct purpose focused on email validation, making disambiguation trivial.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    With only one tool, naming consistency is inherently perfect. The tool name follows a clear verb_noun pattern (verify_email) that would be appropriate if more tools were added, though there are no other tools to compare against.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool is generally too few for most server purposes, creating a thin surface. While email verification could be a narrow domain, typical MCP servers benefit from 3-15 tools for richer functionality. This minimal tool count limits agent capabilities significantly.

    Completeness3/5

    For the narrow domain of email verification, the single tool provides comprehensive validation functionality. However, there are notable gaps for broader email-related operations like bulk verification, list management, or integration with email sending services that might be expected from an email-focused server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources