Delete Worklog

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, signaling a write operation. The description's 'Delete' verb aligns with this. However, it adds no further behavioral details such as permanence, required permissions, or side effects. Given that annotations cover the basic safety profile and the description is consistent, it provides minimal additional transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the verb 'Delete' and the resource, making it easy to scan and understand immediately.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple delete operation with an output schema and annotations, and the schema fully documents parameters. The description provides enough context for an agent to know what the tool does. It lacks explicit mention of irreversibility or permission dependencies, but for a basic deletion action, the information is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters (issue_id and worklog_id) are fully documented in the schema itself. The description does not add any extra parameter semantics. Per the rubric, with high schema coverage, the baseline is 3, and the description contributes nothing beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Delete' and identifies the resource as 'worklog entry (spent time record)' within a Yandex Tracker issue. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling worklog tools like issue_add_worklog and issue_update_worklog, which perform different operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description makes the usage context clear: it is for removing spent time records from an issue. However, it does not explicitly mention when to use this tool over alternatives or state exclusions, such as permission limitations or inability to delete certain worklogs. Still, the context is unambiguous for a straightforward delete operation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.