Skip to main content
Glama
APonkratov

Yandex Tracker MCP Server

by APonkratov

Update Saved Filter

filter_update

Update an existing saved filter in Yandex Tracker by changing its name, query, fields, sorts, grouping, or destination folder.

Instructions

Update a saved Yandex Tracker issue filter

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameNoNew filter name
queryNoReplacement query; mutually exclusive with filter
sortsNoReplacement sort definitions
fieldsNoUI issue fields
filterNoReplacement field-value conditions; mutually exclusive with query
folderNoDestination folder
group_byNoGrouping field or object
filter_idYesSaved filter identifier

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
nameYes
selfYes
ownerNo
queryNo
sortsNo
fieldsNo
filterNo
folderNo
favoriteNo
group_byNo
permissionsNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation readOnlyHint=false already signals a mutation, and the description merely repeats the update action without adding behavioral context. It does not disclose partial-update behavior, whether unspecified fields are preserved, or the effect on the saved filter.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence that immediately conveys the operation. It contains no filler or redundancy and is appropriately sized for a simple update tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The rich schema and output schema cover parameter details and return values, so the minimal description is partially sufficient. However, it omits usage context such as whether this replaces the entire filter or only provided fields, and when to prefer sibling filter_create.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and every parameter has its own description, so the tool description adds no new parameter meaning. The baseline 3 applies because the schema documents parameter roles and constraints thoroughly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update') and the resource ('saved Yandex Tracker issue filter'), distinguishing it from siblings like filter_create and filter_get. The verb and resource are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like filter_create or filter_get. The description relies solely on the word 'Update' and offers no exclusions, prerequisites, or alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/APonkratov/yandex-tracker-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server