mcp-google-business
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-google-business
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage Google Business Profiles by creating posts, replying to reviews, listing locations, and more through natural language commands.1-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to fetch, analyze, and respond to Google Business Profile reviews with AI-generated replies through secure OAuth integration with Google's My Business API.9MIT

ReputeMap MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to manage Google Business Profile reviews, including a filterable review inbox, per-location stats, and honest review-request campaigns.29 npmMIT- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables access to Google Maps business data including search, reviews, photos, and geocoding. Supports searching businesses by location, area, or coordinates, retrieving detailed business information, reviews, and performing reverse geocoding operations.13MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to search places, retrieve place details, reviews, photos, business posts, and contributor review histories from Google Maps through natural language, with no API keys or paid billing required.6MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables managing Google Analytics 4 properties, data streams, conversions, and running reports using natural language through the Admin and Data APIs.2319 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 26 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or workflow step, so an agent can generally tell them apart. The only close pairs are get_daily_metrics vs fetch_multi_daily_metrics and update_location vs update_location_attributes, but their descriptions clearly separate single vs batched and location fields vs attributes.
Most tools follow a predictable verb_noun snake_case pattern like list_locations, create_local_post, and delete_local_post. Minor deviations like auth_status, setup_instructions, raw_request, and the get_/fetch_ metric pair prevent a perfect score.
26 tools is high, but the server covers a genuinely broad domain: OAuth setup, accounts, locations, attributes, reviews, local posts, performance metrics, and an escape hatch. The auth/onboarding block inflates the count, though each step is distinct and earns its place.
Core workflows are covered end-to-end: authentication, account/location listing, location updates, attribute management, review replies, local post CRUD, and performance metrics. Obvious gaps like create/delete location and media endpoints are workable through raw_request but would be cleaner as dedicated tools.