EuConquisto Composer MCP

--- document: API Direct Save Testing Task version: 1.0.0 status: active author: Claude created: 2025-07-03 last_updated: 2025-07-03 --- # TASK-API-DIRECT-SAVE-TESTING-v1.0.0 ## 📋 Task Overview ### Task Identification - **Task ID**: API-DIRECT-SAVE-TEST-001 - **Status**: PENDING - **Owner**: Claude Desktop - **Priority**: CRITICAL - **Dependencies**: API-DIRECT-SAVE-001 (COMPLETED) - **Created**: 2025-07-03 19:24:23 EST - **Estimated Duration**: 30-45 minutes ### Task Description Execute comprehensive testing of the API Direct Save implementation to validate 100% functional composition creation and visualization. ### Supporting Documentation - **Implementation**: `/dist/browser-automation-api-direct-save-v4.0.0.js` - **Analysis**: `/docs/analysis/api-direct-save-implementation-analysis.md` - **Progress**: `/docs/progress/2025-07-03.md` --- ## 🎯 4-Phase Execution Plan ### Phase 1: Understand Scope, Plan Implementation, Define Deliverables #### Scope Understanding - **Primary Objective**: Validate API Direct Save mechanism works end-to-end - **Testing Scope**: Complete workflow from MCP execution to composition visualization - **Success Criteria**: 100% composition save success with immediate visualization #### Related Documentation Analysis - ✅ Implementation completed in `browser-automation-api-direct-save-v4.0.0.js` - ✅ API specification documented in analysis files - ✅ Authentication mechanism defined - ✅ Workflow steps documented #### Implementation Plan 1. **Environment Setup**: Validate prerequisites are met 2. **MCP Execution**: Run educational composition creation 3. **Process Monitoring**: Observe browser automation and API calls 4. **Validation Testing**: Verify composition rendering and functionality 5. **Edge Case Testing**: Test error scenarios and recovery #### Deliverables Definition - **Test Execution Report**: Detailed testing results and observations - **Performance Metrics**: API response times and workflow duration - **Issue Documentation**: Any problems discovered and resolutions - **Validation Confirmation**: Success/failure determination **🛑 STOP AND WAIT** - Do not proceed to implementation **❌ DO NOT** update knowledge graph **⏸️ PAUSE** for explicit next-phase instructions --- ### Phase 2: Implementation #### Step 1: Create Artifacts - **Pre-execution Checklist**: Validate environment setup - **Test Scripts**: Create validation scripts if needed - **Logging Setup**: Configure comprehensive logging - **Version Control**: Ensure proper version tracking #### Step 2: Validate - **Functional Testing**: Execute complete workflow - **Performance Testing**: Measure API response times - **Error Handling**: Test authentication failures and network issues - **User Experience**: Validate browser interactions and visualization **🛑 STOP AND WAIT** - Do not proceed to Phase 3 **❌ DO NOT** update knowledge graph **⏸️ PAUSE** for explicit next-phase instructions --- ### Phase 3: Documentation #### Step 1: Knowledge Graph Updates - Create test execution entity - Document API performance metrics - Record validation results - Link to implementation artifacts #### Step 2: Progress Tracking - Update task status to COMPLETED - Document test results in progress files - Update relevant documentation files - Create test report summary **🛑 STOP AND WAIT** - Do not proceed to Phase 4 **❌ DO NOT** update knowledge graph **⏸️ PAUSE** for explicit next-phase instructions --- ### Phase 4: Thorough Verification #### Implementation Completeness Check - ✅ All test scenarios executed - ✅ Performance metrics captured - ✅ Error conditions validated - ✅ Success criteria met #### System Validation - ✅ API Direct Save mechanism functional - ✅ Composition visualization working - ✅ Browser automation stable - ✅ Authentication flow validated #### Documentation Verification - ✅ Test report generated - ✅ Issues documented - ✅ Results properly versioned - ✅ Progress tracking updated --- ## 🔍 Detailed Test Scenarios ### Scenario 1: Happy Path Testing **Objective**: Validate complete successful workflow **Steps**: 1. Start local redirect server 2. Execute MCP composition creation 3. Observe browser automation 4. Verify API upload success 5. Confirm composition visualization **Expected Results**: - Composition saves successfully - Browser navigates to edit mode - All 6 element types render correctly - Workflow completes in < 45 seconds ### Scenario 2: Authentication Testing **Objective**: Validate authentication data extraction **Steps**: 1. Execute with valid authentication 2. Test with expired tokens 3. Test with missing authentication data **Expected Results**: - Valid auth: Success - Expired tokens: Graceful failure with error message - Missing auth: Clear error notification ### Scenario 3: API Communication Testing **Objective**: Validate direct API save mechanism **Steps**: 1. Monitor network traffic during save 2. Verify proper headers and payload 3. Test API response handling **Expected Results**: - FormData upload successful - Proper authentication headers - Composition UID returned - Error handling for API failures ### Scenario 4: Edge Case Testing **Objective**: Test error conditions and recovery **Steps**: 1. Test with network disconnection 2. Test with invalid connector 3. Test with malformed composition data **Expected Results**: - Graceful error handling - Informative error messages - No browser crashes - Proper cleanup on failure --- ## 📊 Success Metrics ### Quantitative Metrics - **Save Success Rate**: 100% - **Workflow Duration**: < 45 seconds - **API Response Time**: < 5 seconds - **Error Rate**: < 5% for valid scenarios ### Qualitative Metrics - **Visual Quality**: All elements render correctly - **User Experience**: Smooth workflow with no manual intervention - **Error Handling**: Clear, actionable error messages - **Browser Stability**: No crashes or hangs --- ## 🚨 Critical Dependencies ### Technical Requirements - ✅ API Direct Save implementation v4.0.0 complete - ⏳ User authenticated in Composer - ⏳ JWT token file present - ⏳ Local redirect server running ### Environmental Setup - ⏳ Chrome browser available - ⏳ Network connectivity stable - ⏳ MCP server environment ready - ⏳ Claude Desktop ready for execution --- ## 🎯 Acceptance Criteria ### Must Have - [ ] Composition saves successfully via API - [ ] Browser displays composition in edit mode - [ ] All 6 element types visible and functional - [ ] Workflow completes within time limit - [ ] No manual intervention required ### Should Have - [ ] Professional composition titles - [ ] Proper error handling for edge cases - [ ] Performance metrics within targets - [ ] Comprehensive test documentation ### Could Have - [ ] Additional test scenarios - [ ] Performance optimization opportunities - [ ] User experience enhancements - [ ] Extended error recovery options --- *This task represents the critical validation phase for the API Direct Save implementation, ensuring 100% functional composition creation and visualization.*