MCP Code Analysis Server

# MCP Server Migration Intelligence Enhancement Requirements ## Version 1.0 - Modular Monolith Migration Support --- ## Executive Summary This document specifies the requirements for enhancing the existing MCP Code Analysis Server to support comprehensive modular monolith migration capabilities. The enhancements will transform the server from a code analysis tool into a complete migration intelligence platform capable of planning, guiding, and validating software architecture transformations. ### Scope - Migration strategy planning and roadmap generation - Risk assessment and impact analysis - Effort estimation and resource planning - Interface design and contract generation - Migration execution guidance and validation - Progress tracking and quality monitoring - Knowledge management and organizational learning ### Success Criteria - Reduce migration planning time by 70% - Increase migration success rate to 95%+ - Decrease migration risk through automated assessment - Enable repeatable migration processes across organizations --- ## 1. Migration Strategy & Planning Requirements ### REQ-MSP-001: Migration Plan Generation **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Generate comprehensive migration roadmaps that transform monolithic applications into modular monoliths based on domain-driven design principles. **User Stories**: - As a software architect, I want to generate a complete migration plan so that I have a clear roadmap for transforming my monolith - As a project manager, I want to understand migration phases and dependencies so that I can allocate resources effectively - As a development team lead, I want to see detailed migration steps so that my team knows exactly what to implement **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must generate migration plans with multiple strategy options (strangler fig, big bang, gradual) - Must identify migration phases with clear entry/exit criteria - Must define dependencies between migration steps - Must provide timeline estimates based on team capacity - Must account for business constraints (downtime windows, API compatibility) - Must generate rollback plans for each migration phase - Must integrate with existing bounded context analysis - Must support customization of migration strategies per organization **Input Requirements**: - Target architecture specification (modular monolith, microservices, etc.) - Migration strategy preference (strangler fig, big bang, gradual) - Risk tolerance level (low, moderate, high) - Timeline constraints and preferences - Team size and skill composition - Business constraints and requirements - Existing bounded context analysis results **Output Requirements**: - Structured migration roadmap with phases - Detailed step-by-step execution plan - Resource allocation recommendations - Timeline projections with confidence intervals - Risk mitigation strategies per phase - Success metrics and validation criteria ### REQ-MSP-002: Module Extraction Planning **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Create detailed plans for extracting individual modules from monolithic codebases while maintaining system integrity and business continuity. **User Stories**: - As a senior developer, I want detailed module extraction steps so that I can safely extract business domains without breaking the system - As a DevOps engineer, I want to understand infrastructure changes required so that I can prepare deployment environments - As a QA engineer, I want to know testing requirements so that I can validate extraction success **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must generate step-by-step extraction procedures for each bounded context - Must identify shared resources that require careful handling - Must define interface requirements between extracted modules - Must specify data migration requirements - Must identify testing requirements at each extraction step - Must provide rollback procedures for failed extractions - Must account for different extraction strategies (interface-first, data-first, service-first) - Must validate extraction feasibility before plan generation **Input Requirements**: - Bounded context specification - Extraction strategy preference - Dependency analysis results - Shared resource inventory - Testing strategy requirements - Performance requirements - Data ownership analysis **Output Requirements**: - Detailed extraction procedure with checkpoints - Interface specification requirements - Data migration plan and scripts - Testing validation criteria - Infrastructure modification requirements - Rollback procedure documentation ### REQ-MSP-003: Migration Strategy Selection **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Recommend optimal migration strategies based on codebase analysis, organizational constraints, and risk factors. **User Stories**: - As a CTO, I want strategy recommendations so that I can choose the approach that best fits our organization - As a solution architect, I want to compare different migration approaches so that I can make informed decisions - As a risk manager, I want to understand the implications of each strategy so that I can assess organizational risk **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must analyze codebase characteristics to recommend appropriate strategies - Must consider organizational factors (team size, timeline, risk tolerance) - Must provide comparative analysis of different approaches - Must identify success factors and potential pitfalls for each strategy - Must adapt recommendations based on historical migration data - Must support custom strategy definition and evaluation **Input Requirements**: - Codebase complexity metrics - Organizational constraints and preferences - Historical migration performance data - Team capability assessment - Business continuity requirements - Technical debt levels **Output Requirements**: - Ranked strategy recommendations with rationale - Comparative analysis matrix - Success probability estimates - Risk assessment for each strategy - Resource requirement comparisons - Timeline impact analysis --- ## 2. Risk Assessment & Impact Analysis Requirements ### REQ-RIA-001: Migration Risk Assessment **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Provide comprehensive risk analysis for migration activities considering technical, operational, and business factors. **User Stories**: - As a project manager, I want to understand migration risks so that I can plan mitigation strategies - As a business stakeholder, I want to know potential business impact so that I can make informed go/no-go decisions - As a development team, I want to identify high-risk areas so that we can focus testing and validation efforts **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must assess technical risks (complexity, coupling, test coverage) - Must evaluate operational risks (downtime, performance impact, deployment complexity) - Must analyze business risks (customer impact, revenue impact, compliance) - Must provide risk scores with confidence levels - Must suggest mitigation strategies for identified risks - Must track risk levels throughout migration process - Must integrate with existing anti-pattern detection - Must support custom risk factors and weighting **Input Requirements**: - Code complexity metrics - Coupling analysis results - Test coverage data - Business criticality assessments - Historical incident data - Performance baseline metrics - Compliance requirements **Output Requirements**: - Comprehensive risk assessment report - Risk factor breakdown and scoring - Mitigation strategy recommendations - Risk trend analysis and monitoring - Business impact projections - Technical debt risk correlation ### REQ-RIA-002: Impact Analysis **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Analyze and predict the impact of proposed migration changes across multiple dimensions including performance, reliability, maintainability, and team productivity. **User Stories**: - As a performance engineer, I want to understand performance impact so that I can validate system requirements - As a team lead, I want to know productivity impact so that I can plan team capacity - As a reliability engineer, I want to assess system reliability changes so that I can adjust monitoring and alerting **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must predict performance impact of proposed changes - Must assess reliability and availability implications - Must evaluate maintainability improvements - Must estimate productivity impact on development teams - Must analyze user experience changes - Must provide quantitative impact metrics where possible - Must support scenario-based impact analysis - Must track actual vs. predicted impact for learning **Input Requirements**: - Proposed migration changes specification - Current system performance baselines - Historical reliability data - Team productivity metrics - User experience metrics - System architecture documentation **Output Requirements**: - Multi-dimensional impact analysis report - Quantitative impact predictions with confidence intervals - Risk-adjusted impact scenarios - Monitoring and validation requirements - Success criteria for impact measurement ### REQ-RIA-003: Dependency Impact Analysis **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Analyze how migration changes will affect system dependencies, both internal and external. **User Stories**: - As an integration specialist, I want to understand dependency changes so that I can coordinate with external teams - As a systems architect, I want to see the ripple effects of changes so that I can plan comprehensive testing - As a product owner, I want to know which features might be affected so that I can communicate with stakeholders **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must identify all affected dependencies (internal and external) - Must assess the impact severity on each dependency - Must provide timeline for dependency updates - Must identify coordination requirements with external teams - Must suggest dependency decoupling strategies - Must validate dependency compatibility post-migration **Input Requirements**: - Current dependency mapping - Proposed architectural changes - External API specifications - Integration test results - Vendor relationship information **Output Requirements**: - Comprehensive dependency impact report - Coordination timeline and requirements - Compatibility validation plan - Decoupling strategy recommendations --- ## 3. Effort Estimation & Resource Planning Requirements ### REQ-ERP-001: Migration Effort Estimation **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Provide accurate effort estimates for migration activities using machine learning models trained on historical data and code complexity metrics. **User Stories**: - As a project manager, I want accurate effort estimates so that I can create realistic project timelines - As a resource planner, I want to understand skill requirements so that I can allocate appropriate team members - As a budget owner, I want cost estimates so that I can approve migration investments **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must provide effort estimates in multiple units (hours, days, story points) - Must consider team velocity and historical performance - Must account for complexity factors and technical debt - Must provide confidence intervals for estimates - Must adapt estimates based on actual progress - Must support different estimation methodologies - Must factor in skill levels and team composition - Must include estimates for testing, documentation, and deployment **Input Requirements**: - Migration scope definition - Code complexity metrics - Team velocity data - Historical migration performance - Skill assessment of team members - Technical debt measurements - Testing requirements **Output Requirements**: - Detailed effort breakdown by activity - Resource allocation recommendations - Timeline projections with confidence levels - Skill requirement specifications - Cost estimation reports - Risk-adjusted estimate scenarios ### REQ-ERP-002: Resource Requirements Analysis **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Analyze and specify the human and technical resources required for successful migration execution. **User Stories**: - As a resource manager, I want to understand resource needs so that I can plan team assignments - As a technical lead, I want to know infrastructure requirements so that I can prepare environments - As a training coordinator, I want to identify skill gaps so that I can plan appropriate training **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must identify required skill sets and experience levels - Must specify infrastructure and tooling requirements - Must account for parallel work streams and dependencies - Must identify potential bottlenecks and constraints - Must provide scaling recommendations for large migrations - Must support resource optimization across multiple projects **Input Requirements**: - Migration plan complexity - Required technology stack expertise - Infrastructure capacity requirements - Parallel execution opportunities - Team availability and constraints **Output Requirements**: - Comprehensive resource requirement specification - Skill gap analysis and training recommendations - Infrastructure scaling requirements - Resource utilization optimization plan - Bottleneck identification and mitigation ### REQ-ERP-003: Capacity Planning **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Functional **Description**: Plan team capacity and workload distribution across migration phases to optimize delivery timeline and quality. **User Stories**: - As a delivery manager, I want optimized capacity plans so that I can maximize team efficiency - As a team member, I want to understand my workload so that I can plan my capacity - As a program manager, I want to balance multiple migration efforts so that I can optimize overall delivery **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must distribute workload across team members based on skills and availability - Must identify capacity constraints and suggest solutions - Must optimize for both speed and quality outcomes - Must account for knowledge transfer and learning curves - Must support dynamic capacity reallocation during execution **Input Requirements**: - Team member skills and availability - Migration task complexity and dependencies - Quality requirements and constraints - Timeline objectives and flexibility **Output Requirements**: - Optimized capacity allocation plan - Workload distribution recommendations - Constraint resolution strategies - Dynamic reallocation guidelines --- ## 4. Interface & Contract Design Requirements ### REQ-ICD-001: Module Interface Generation **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Generate clean, well-defined interfaces for extracted modules based on domain analysis and architectural patterns. **User Stories**: - As a software architect, I want automatically generated interfaces so that I can ensure consistent module boundaries - As a developer, I want clear interface specifications so that I can implement modules correctly - As an API designer, I want contract-first interfaces so that I can maintain backward compatibility **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must generate interfaces from bounded context analysis - Must support multiple interface styles (REST, GraphQL, event-driven, command-query) - Must include comprehensive data schemas and validation rules - Must provide versioning strategies and backward compatibility guidelines - Must generate documentation and examples - Must validate interface completeness and consistency - Must support custom interface patterns and conventions **Input Requirements**: - Bounded context definitions - Domain model specifications - Architectural style preferences - Existing API patterns and conventions - Backward compatibility requirements - Performance and scalability requirements **Output Requirements**: - Complete interface specifications (OpenAPI, GraphQL schemas, etc.) - Data model definitions and validation rules - API documentation with examples - Versioning and compatibility guidelines - Implementation guidance and best practices ### REQ-ICD-002: Contract Validation Framework **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Create comprehensive validation frameworks to ensure module interfaces adhere to defined contracts and architectural principles. **User Stories**: - As a quality engineer, I want automated contract validation so that I can ensure interface compliance - As a developer, I want immediate feedback on contract violations so that I can fix issues quickly - As an integration tester, I want contract tests so that I can validate module interactions **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must generate contract validation rules from interface specifications - Must provide real-time validation during development - Must create comprehensive test suites for contract compliance - Must validate both request/response formats and business rules - Must support contract evolution and versioning validation - Must integrate with existing testing frameworks **Input Requirements**: - Interface specifications and contracts - Business rule definitions - Validation rule requirements - Testing framework preferences - CI/CD integration requirements **Output Requirements**: - Automated validation rule sets - Contract test generation - Real-time validation feedback mechanisms - Integration test specifications - Compliance monitoring dashboards ### REQ-ICD-003: Integration Pattern Design **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Design and specify integration patterns for communication between modules including synchronous APIs, asynchronous messaging, and event-driven architectures. **User Stories**: - As a systems architect, I want standard integration patterns so that I can ensure consistent module communication - As a developer, I want implementation guidance so that I can build reliable integrations - As a performance engineer, I want optimized communication patterns so that I can meet performance requirements **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must recommend appropriate integration patterns based on use case analysis - Must provide implementation templates and examples - Must consider performance, reliability, and scalability requirements - Must support both synchronous and asynchronous communication patterns - Must include error handling and resilience patterns - Must provide monitoring and observability guidance **Input Requirements**: - Module interaction requirements - Performance and latency requirements - Reliability and consistency requirements - Scalability projections - Technology stack constraints **Output Requirements**: - Integration pattern recommendations - Implementation templates and examples - Performance optimization guidelines - Error handling and resilience strategies - Monitoring and alerting specifications --- ## 5. Migration Execution Support Requirements ### REQ-MES-001: Migration Step Validation **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Validate migration steps before execution to ensure prerequisites are met and reduce the risk of failed migrations. **User Stories**: - As a migration engineer, I want pre-execution validation so that I can avoid costly migration failures - As a deployment manager, I want automated checks so that I can ensure safe deployment conditions - As a quality assurance lead, I want validation criteria so that I can approve migration steps **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must validate all prerequisites before step execution - Must check system state and readiness conditions - Must verify data consistency and integrity - Must validate test coverage and quality gates - Must confirm rollback procedures are available - Must provide clear pass/fail criteria with detailed reporting - Must support custom validation rules and criteria **Input Requirements**: - Migration step definitions - System state requirements - Quality gate specifications - Test coverage requirements - Rollback procedure validation **Output Requirements**: - Comprehensive validation reports - Pass/fail status with detailed explanations - Remediation guidance for failed validations - Risk assessment for proceeding with warnings ### REQ-MES-002: Code Transformation Guidance **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Provide detailed, step-by-step guidance for implementing code transformations during migration activities. **User Stories**: - As a developer, I want detailed transformation steps so that I can implement changes correctly - As a code reviewer, I want transformation patterns so that I can validate implementation quality - As a team lead, I want consistent guidance so that all team members follow the same patterns **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must provide step-by-step transformation instructions - Must include code templates and examples - Must specify testing requirements for each transformation - Must identify potential issues and mitigation strategies - Must provide validation criteria for transformation success - Must support different transformation patterns and approaches **Input Requirements**: - Source code analysis results - Target architecture specifications - Transformation type and scope - Quality requirements and constraints - Technology stack and framework preferences **Output Requirements**: - Detailed transformation procedures - Code templates and implementation examples - Testing and validation requirements - Quality criteria and acceptance tests - Troubleshooting guides and common issues ### REQ-MES-003: Real-time Progress Tracking **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Monitor and track migration progress in real-time, providing visibility into completion status, quality metrics, and potential issues. **User Stories**: - As a project manager, I want real-time progress visibility so that I can track migration status - As a team member, I want to see overall progress so that I can understand my contribution - As a stakeholder, I want milestone tracking so that I can plan business activities **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must track progress against migration plan milestones - Must monitor quality metrics throughout migration - Must provide real-time dashboards and reporting - Must alert on deviations from plan or quality thresholds - Must support multiple progress measurement methodologies - Must integrate with existing project management tools **Input Requirements**: - Migration plan with milestones - Quality metric definitions - Progress measurement criteria - Integration requirements for existing tools **Output Requirements**: - Real-time progress dashboards - Milestone completion tracking - Quality trend analysis - Deviation alerts and notifications - Progress reports and summaries --- ## 6. Quality Monitoring & Validation Requirements ### REQ-QMV-001: Quality Regression Detection **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Functional **Description**: Continuously monitor code quality metrics and detect regressions introduced during migration activities. **User Stories**: - As a quality engineer, I want automated regression detection so that I can maintain code quality standards - As a developer, I want immediate feedback on quality changes so that I can address issues quickly - As a team lead, I want quality trends so that I can guide improvement efforts **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must monitor comprehensive quality metrics (complexity, coupling, test coverage, etc.) - Must detect statistically significant regressions - Must provide root cause analysis for quality degradation - Must suggest remediation strategies for identified regressions - Must support custom quality metrics and thresholds - Must integrate with continuous integration pipelines **Input Requirements**: - Baseline quality metrics - Quality threshold definitions - Monitoring frequency requirements - Integration with CI/CD systems **Output Requirements**: - Quality regression alerts - Trend analysis and reporting - Root cause analysis reports - Remediation recommendations - Quality improvement suggestions ### REQ-QMV-002: Architectural Compliance Monitoring **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Monitor adherence to architectural principles and patterns throughout the migration process. **User Stories**: - As a software architect, I want compliance monitoring so that I can ensure architectural integrity - As a governance lead, I want violation reporting so that I can enforce architectural standards - As a developer, I want guidance on compliance so that I can follow architectural principles **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must validate adherence to modular monolith principles - Must detect boundary violations and coupling issues - Must monitor dependency direction compliance - Must validate interface usage patterns - Must provide architectural guidance and recommendations - Must support custom architectural rules and patterns **Input Requirements**: - Architectural principles and rules - Module boundary definitions - Dependency direction requirements - Interface usage patterns **Output Requirements**: - Architectural compliance reports - Violation detection and alerts - Guidance for compliance improvement - Architectural quality metrics ### REQ-QMV-003: Performance Impact Monitoring **Priority**: High **Category**: Functional **Description**: Monitor system performance throughout migration to detect degradation and validate performance improvements. **User Stories**: - As a performance engineer, I want performance monitoring so that I can validate system performance - As an operations team member, I want alerts on performance degradation so that I can respond quickly - As a product owner, I want performance insights so that I can understand user impact **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must monitor key performance indicators throughout migration - Must detect performance regressions and improvements - Must correlate performance changes with migration activities - Must provide performance trend analysis - Must suggest performance optimization opportunities **Input Requirements**: - Performance baseline metrics - Key performance indicators - Performance threshold definitions - Monitoring infrastructure integration **Output Requirements**: - Performance monitoring dashboards - Performance impact analysis - Regression and improvement alerts - Optimization recommendations --- ## 7. Knowledge Management & Learning Requirements ### REQ-KML-001: Migration Pattern Library **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Functional **Description**: Build and maintain a library of successful migration patterns that can be reused across different projects and organizations. **User Stories**: - As a software architect, I want access to proven patterns so that I can apply successful strategies - As an organization, I want to capture institutional knowledge so that we can improve future migrations - As a consultant, I want pattern libraries so that I can provide better guidance to clients **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must extract patterns from successful migration executions - Must categorize patterns by context and applicability - Must provide pattern matching for similar migration scenarios - Must support pattern evolution and improvement over time - Must enable pattern sharing across organizations - Must include success metrics and applicability criteria **Input Requirements**: - Historical migration data - Success criteria and outcomes - Context information for pattern applicability - Pattern categorization schemes **Output Requirements**: - Searchable pattern library - Pattern matching recommendations - Success probability estimates - Pattern evolution tracking - Best practice documentation ### REQ-KML-002: Decision Tracking & Learning **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Functional **Description**: Track migration decisions, their rationale, and outcomes to enable organizational learning and improve future decision-making. **User Stories**: - As a decision maker, I want to understand the rationale behind previous decisions so that I can learn from experience - As an organization, I want to track decision outcomes so that we can improve our decision-making process - As a new team member, I want access to decision history so that I can understand project context **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must capture decision context, alternatives considered, and rationale - Must track decision outcomes and their correlation with success - Must provide decision history and evolution tracking - Must enable decision pattern analysis and learning - Must support decision quality assessment and improvement **Input Requirements**: - Decision point identification - Alternative options and evaluation criteria - Decision rationale documentation - Outcome tracking requirements **Output Requirements**: - Decision history database - Decision outcome analysis - Decision pattern identification - Decision quality metrics - Learning recommendations ### REQ-KML-003: Migration Documentation Generation **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Functional **Description**: Automatically generate comprehensive documentation for migration processes, decisions, and outcomes. **User Stories**: - As a documentation specialist, I want automated generation so that documentation stays current - As a knowledge manager, I want comprehensive records so that institutional knowledge is preserved - As a team member, I want accessible documentation so that I can understand migration context **Acceptance Criteria**: - Must generate documentation from migration data and activities - Must support multiple documentation formats and audiences - Must maintain documentation version control and history - Must provide searchable and cross-referenced documentation - Must enable collaborative documentation improvement **Input Requirements**: - Migration process data - Decision records and rationale - Outcome measurements and analysis - Documentation templates and standards **Output Requirements**: - Comprehensive migration documentation - Searchable knowledge base - Cross-referenced documentation links - Version-controlled documentation history - Collaborative editing capabilities --- ## 8. Non-Functional Requirements ### REQ-NFR-001: Performance Requirements **Priority**: High **Category**: Non-Functional **Description**: The enhanced MCP server must maintain high performance while providing comprehensive migration intelligence capabilities. **Requirements**: - Migration plan generation must complete within 5 minutes for codebases up to 1M lines - Risk assessment must complete within 2 minutes for typical enterprise applications - Real-time progress tracking must update within 30 seconds of changes - Interface generation must complete within 1 minute for typical bounded contexts - System must support concurrent analysis of up to 10 migration projects - Memory usage must not exceed 16GB for largest supported codebases - Database queries must complete within 5 seconds for 95% of operations ### REQ-NFR-002: Scalability Requirements **Priority**: High **Category**: Non-Functional **Description**: The system must scale to support large organizations with multiple concurrent migration projects. **Requirements**: - Must support codebases up to 10M lines of code - Must handle up to 100 concurrent users - Must support up to 50 concurrent migration projects - Must scale horizontally across multiple server instances - Must maintain performance with growing historical data - Must support distributed analysis across multiple geographic regions ### REQ-NFR-003: Reliability Requirements **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Non-Functional **Description**: The system must provide high reliability for mission-critical migration activities. **Requirements**: - System availability must be 99.9% during business hours - Data loss probability must be less than 0.01% - Migration plan corruption probability must be less than 0.001% - System must recover from failures within 5 minutes - All critical operations must have automatic retry mechanisms - System must maintain data consistency across all operations ### REQ-NFR-004: Security Requirements **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Non-Functional **Description**: The system must protect sensitive code and migration data. **Requirements**: - All data must be encrypted in transit and at rest - User authentication and authorization must be enforced - Access control must be role-based with fine-grained permissions - Audit logs must be maintained for all critical operations - Data access must comply with organizational security policies - Integration with enterprise identity management systems ### REQ-NFR-005: Usability Requirements **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Non-Functional **Description**: The system must be usable by technical professionals with varying levels of migration experience. **Requirements**: - API responses must be self-documenting with clear schemas - Error messages must be actionable and provide remediation guidance - Documentation must be comprehensive and searchable - System must provide guided workflows for common scenarios - Configuration must be straightforward with sensible defaults - Integration with popular development tools and IDEs --- ## 9. Integration Requirements ### REQ-INT-001: LangGraph Integration **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Integration **Description**: Seamless integration with LangGraph hierarchical agent system for orchestrated migration execution. **Requirements**: - Must provide MCP tool interfaces compatible with LangGraph agents - Must support asynchronous operations for long-running analysis - Must provide progress callbacks for real-time monitoring - Must handle agent state management and context preservation - Must support agent retry and error recovery mechanisms ### REQ-INT-002: Claude Code SDK Integration **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Integration **Description**: Coordinate with Claude Code SDK for guided code transformation execution. **Requirements**: - Must provide transformation guidance compatible with Claude Code workflows - Must validate transformation results against migration plans - Must support iterative refinement based on validation feedback - Must coordinate parallel transformations across multiple modules - Must provide rollback support for failed transformations ### REQ-INT-003: Development Tool Integration **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Integration **Description**: Integration with popular development tools and platforms. **Requirements**: - Must integrate with Git repositories for change tracking - Must provide IDE plugins for development workflow integration - Must support CI/CD pipeline integration for automated validation - Must integrate with project management tools for progress tracking - Must provide API endpoints for custom tool development --- ## 10. Data Requirements ### REQ-DAT-001: Migration Data Model **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Data **Description**: Comprehensive data model for storing migration plans, progress, and outcomes. **Requirements**: - Must store hierarchical migration plans with dependencies - Must track migration progress and milestone completion - Must maintain version history for all migration artifacts - Must store decision history with rationale and outcomes - Must support data export for analysis and reporting - Must maintain data relationships and referential integrity ### REQ-DAT-002: Historical Data Management **Priority**: High **Category**: Data **Description**: Management of historical migration data for learning and improvement. **Requirements**: - Must store historical migration performance data - Must maintain pattern library with success metrics - Must track decision outcomes and their correlation with success - Must support data anonymization for cross-organizational sharing - Must provide data retention policies and archival strategies - Must enable data analysis for continuous improvement ### REQ-DAT-003: Data Quality & Consistency **Priority**: High **Category**: Data **Description**: Ensure high quality and consistency of migration data. **Requirements**: - Must validate data integrity across all operations - Must provide data consistency checks and reconciliation - Must maintain audit trails for all data modifications - Must support data backup and recovery procedures - Must ensure data accuracy through validation rules - Must provide data quality metrics and monitoring --- ## 11. Acceptance Criteria & Testing Requirements ### REQ-ACC-001: Functional Testing **Priority**: Critical **Category**: Testing **Description**: Comprehensive testing of all migration intelligence functionality. **Requirements**: - Unit tests must cover 95% of code with meaningful assertions - Integration tests must validate all MCP tool interfaces - End-to-end tests must cover complete migration scenarios - Performance tests must validate response time requirements - Load tests must validate scalability requirements - Security tests must validate access control and data protection ### REQ-ACC-002: Migration Scenario Testing **Priority**: High **Category**: Testing **Description**: Testing with realistic migration scenarios across different types of applications. **Requirements**: - Must test with codebases of varying sizes (10K to 10M lines) - Must test with different architectural patterns and technologies - Must validate with historical migration data where available - Must test edge cases and error conditions - Must validate migration plan quality through expert review - Must measure improvement in migration success rates ### REQ-ACC-003: Performance Validation **Priority**: High **Category**: Testing **Description**: Validation of performance requirements under realistic conditions. **Requirements**: - Must validate response times under expected load conditions - Must test scalability with increasing data volumes - Must validate memory usage with large codebases - Must test concurrent user scenarios - Must validate performance degradation limits - Must measure performance improvement over baseline --- ## 12. Dependencies & Constraints ### REQ-DEP-001: Technology Dependencies **Priority**: High **Category**: Dependencies **Description**: Dependencies on existing technologies and frameworks. **Requirements**: - Must maintain compatibility with existing MCP server architecture - Must integrate with current database schema and data model - Must support existing TreeSitter and OpenAI integrations - Must maintain compatibility with FastMCP framework - Must support existing configuration and deployment mechanisms ### REQ-DEP-002: Resource Constraints **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Constraints **Description**: Resource constraints that must be considered during implementation. **Requirements**: - Implementation must be completed within 12-week timeline - Must work within existing infrastructure capacity limits - Must optimize for development team size and expertise - Must consider budget constraints for additional infrastructure - Must minimize disruption to existing MCP server users ### REQ-DEP-003: Compliance Constraints **Priority**: Medium **Category**: Constraints **Description**: Compliance and regulatory constraints that must be maintained. **Requirements**: - Must maintain existing security and privacy protections - Must comply with organizational data governance policies - Must support existing audit and compliance reporting - Must maintain compatibility with enterprise security requirements - Must support existing data retention and disposal policies --- ## Appendices ### Appendix A: Glossary - **Migration Intelligence**: Comprehensive analysis and guidance capabilities for software architecture transformation - **Modular Monolith**: Architectural pattern that structures applications as a single deployable unit with clearly defined internal module boundaries - **Bounded Context**: Domain-driven design concept representing a clear boundary within which a domain model is consistent - **Strangler Fig Pattern**: Migration strategy that gradually replaces legacy system components - **MCP (Model Context Protocol)**: Protocol for integrating AI models with external systems and tools ### Appendix B: Success Metrics - Migration planning time reduction: 70% - Migration success rate improvement: 95%+ - Risk prediction accuracy: 90%+ - Effort estimation accuracy: ±20% - User satisfaction score: 8.5/10 - Time to value for new users: <2 hours ### Appendix C: Risk Assessment - **High Risk**: Integration complexity with existing systems - **Medium Risk**: Performance impact on existing functionality - **Low Risk**: User adoption and change management - **Mitigation**: Comprehensive testing, phased rollout, extensive documentation