Kaiza MCP Server

# ATLAS-GATE MCP Maturity Model & Roadmap **Enterprise Capability Assessment and Multi-Year Vision** **Current Status**: Level 3 (Managed) **Target Status**: Level 5 (Optimized) **Document Version**: 1.0.0 --- ## Overview This maturity model defines organizational and technical capabilities across six dimensions, with a multi-year roadmap toward Level 5 (Optimized) operations. ### Maturity Levels | Level | Name | Description | Timeframe | |-------|------|-------------|-----------| | **1** | **Ad Hoc** | Initial, unpredictable, reactive | N/A (baseline) | | **2** | **Repeatable** | Documented processes, basic controls | N/A (baseline) | | **3** | **Managed** | Defined standards, monitored | Current (v1.0) | | **4** | **Measured** | Quantified, automated analysis | v2.0 (2026-Q3) | | **5** | **Optimized** | Continuous improvement, predictive | v3.0 (2027-Q2) | --- ## Dimension 1: Reliability Ability to operate without failure; incident response and recovery. ### Current Status (Level 3: Managed) **Capabilities:** - ✅ Plan-based authorization prevents unauthorized changes - ✅ Cryptographic audit logging for all operations - ✅ Comprehensive error handling with audit trail integration - ✅ Bootstrap secret mechanism for first initialization - ✅ Session locking on hard failures - ✅ Manual failover and recovery procedures documented - ✅ Audit log verification tools available **Gaps:** - No automated failover - Limited metrics on operational reliability - No SLA reporting - Manual incident response only ### Level 4 (Planned: v2.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Automated health checks and alerting - [ ] Metrics dashboard for availability (uptime, latency) - [ ] Graceful degradation modes - [ ] Automated backup and recovery - [ ] Real-time incident detection **Deliverables:** - Health check API endpoint - Prometheus metrics exporter - Incident notification system - Recovery runbooks (automated where possible) ### Level 5 (Planned: v3.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Predictive failure detection (ML-based anomaly detection) - [ ] Self-healing infrastructure - [ ] Zero-downtime deployments - [ ] 99.99% uptime SLA - [ ] Automatic incident remediation --- ## Dimension 2: Security Governance, threat prevention, and risk management. ### Current Status (Level 3: Managed) **Capabilities:** - ✅ Zero-trust architecture (all operations require explicit authorization) - ✅ Dual-role governance (ANTIGRAVITY/WINDSURF separation) - ✅ Role-based access control (RBAC) - ✅ Cryptographic audit trails (SHA256 content integrity) - ✅ Plan-based authorization (signed plans) - ✅ Bootstrap secret mechanism - ✅ Vulnerability reporting process - ✅ Security policy and incident response procedures - ✅ Dependency scanning (manual) - ✅ OWASP Top 10 compliance review **Gaps:** - No automated vulnerability scanning in CI/CD - No compliance reporting (SOC 2, ISO 27001) - Limited secret rotation mechanisms - No key rotation strategy - Manual security audits only ### Level 4 (Planned: v2.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Automated dependency vulnerability scanning - [ ] Automated secret rotation - [ ] SOC 2 Type II certification audit - [ ] OWASP scanning in CI/CD - [ ] Fine-grained audit log analysis - [ ] Security metrics dashboard **Deliverables:** - Dependabot/Snyk integration - Secret rotation automation - Security compliance dashboard - Threat intelligence feeds ### Level 5 (Planned: v3.0) **Goals:** - [ ] ISO 27001 certification - [ ] Real-time threat detection (SIEM integration) - [ ] Adaptive security policies - [ ] Automated incident response - [ ] Quantum-resistant cryptography (future-proofing) --- ## Dimension 3: Observability Visibility into system behavior, debugging, and performance. ### Current Status (Level 3: Managed) **Capabilities:** - ✅ Comprehensive audit logging (every operation recorded) - ✅ Audit log verification tools - ✅ Execution replay (forensic analysis) - ✅ Attestation bundles for evidence export - ✅ Manual log analysis - ✅ Error code taxonomy - ✅ Session state tracking **Gaps:** - No real-time monitoring/alerting - No metrics collection - Limited visualization (mostly logs) - No performance profiling - No distributed tracing - Manual log analysis required ### Level 4 (Planned: v2.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Prometheus metrics export - [ ] Log aggregation (ELK/Datadog integration) - [ ] Real-time dashboards (audit metrics, execution stats) - [ ] Distributed tracing (OpenTelemetry) - [ ] Performance profiling - [ ] Alert rules (anomaly detection) **Deliverables:** - Metrics exporter module - Grafana dashboard templates - Structured logging (JSON) - Performance benchmarks ### Level 5 (Planned: v3.0) **Goals:** - [ ] AI-driven anomaly detection - [ ] Predictive capacity planning - [ ] Self-describing telemetry - [ ] Cost allocation per plan/execution - [ ] Proactive issue prediction --- ## Dimension 4: Operability Ease of deployment, configuration, and maintenance. ### Current Status (Level 3: Managed) **Capabilities:** - ✅ Documented deployment procedures - ✅ Bootstrap automation scripts (bash, PowerShell) - ✅ Configuration via environment variables - ✅ Multiple client support (Windsurf, Claude Desktop, custom) - ✅ Clear separation of concerns (roles) - ✅ Runbooks available - ✅ Tested on Windows, macOS, Linux **Gaps:** - No container support (Docker) - No Kubernetes integration - No automated deployment pipeline - Limited configuration validation - Manual version upgrades - No multi-node clustering ### Level 4 (Planned: v2.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Docker image and Compose file - [ ] Kubernetes Helm chart - [ ] Infrastructure-as-Code templates (Terraform) - [ ] Configuration validation schema - [ ] Zero-downtime upgrade procedures - [ ] Automated health checks in deployment **Deliverables:** - Dockerfile and docker-compose.yml - Helm chart (with values validation) - Terraform modules - CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions) ### Level 5 (Planned: v3.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Multi-region deployment support - [ ] Automatic scaling and load balancing - [ ] Service mesh integration (Istio) - [ ] One-click disaster recovery - [ ] Fully GitOps-driven operations --- ## Dimension 5: Governance & Compliance Organizational controls, audit, and regulatory alignment. ### Current Status (Level 3: Managed) **Capabilities:** - ✅ Dual-role governance model enforced in code - ✅ Plan-based authorization (explicit approval required) - ✅ Audit trails (immutable, cryptographically verified) - ✅ Change control via plans - ✅ Security policy document - ✅ Contributing guidelines - ✅ ADR system for architectural decisions - ✅ Documentation version control - ✅ Vulnerability reporting process - ✅ Access control per role **Gaps:** - No automated compliance checking - No audit report generation - No delegation/approval workflows - Limited user provisioning automation - No formal governance board - No SLA definitions ### Level 4 (Planned: v2.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Automated compliance reporting (OWASP, NIST, SOC 2) - [ ] Approval workflow automation (multi-approver support) - [ ] User provisioning/deprovisioning - [ ] Audit report generation - [ ] Regulatory alignment checklist - [ ] Formal governance documentation **Deliverables:** - Compliance dashboard - Approval workflow engine - User management API - Audit report templates ### Level 5 (Planned: v3.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Real-time compliance monitoring - [ ] Automated remediation of non-compliance - [ ] Formal governance board structure - [ ] External audit integration - [ ] Compliance-as-Code --- ## Dimension 6: Documentation Quality, completeness, and maintainability of documentation. ### Current Status (Level 3: Managed) **Capabilities:** - ✅ Comprehensive guides (beginners to experts) - ✅ Architecture documentation - ✅ Security policies - ✅ Versioned documentation (v1, v2 directories) - ✅ Glossary for non-technical audiences - ✅ ADR system - ✅ Troubleshooting guides - ✅ Diagram sources (Mermaid/PlantUML) - ✅ Rendered diagram outputs - ✅ Documentation lifecycle process - ✅ DOCUMENTATION_CHANGELOG.md **Gaps:** - No automated doc generation from code - Limited API reference automation - No interactive tutorials - No video documentation - Limited code example validation ### Level 4 (Planned: v2.0) **Goals:** - [ ] Automated API documentation (JSDoc → markdown) - [ ] Link validation in CI/CD - [ ] Documentation coverage metrics - [ ] Code example testing (ensure examples work) - [ ] Interactive tutorials (browser-based) - [ ] Multilingual documentation (Spanish, Chinese, Japanese) **Deliverables:** - JSDoc-to-markdown generator - Example code validation tests - Interactive tutorial platform - Translation framework ### Level 5 (Planned: v3.0) **Goals:** - [ ] AI-powered documentation generation - [ ] Self-updating code examples - [ ] Documentation-driven development (docs first) - [ ] Video walkthroughs (auto-generated) - [ ] Personalized learning paths --- ## Multi-Year Roadmap ### Phase 1: Foundation (v1.0 - Current) **Timeline**: 2024 - Now **Focus**: Establish core governance and audit capabilities. **Delivered:** - Dual-role governance model - Plan-based authorization - Cryptographic audit logging - Bootstrap security mechanism - Comprehensive documentation - ADR system **Status**: ✅ Complete --- ### Phase 2: Operationalization (v2.0) **Timeline**: 2026 Q1 - Q3 (6 months) **Focus**: Deployment automation, monitoring, and compliance reporting. **Key Deliverables:** - Docker & Kubernetes support - Prometheus metrics exporter - Automated vulnerability scanning - Compliance dashboard - Cloud deployment templates (AWS, GCP, Azure) - Interactive tutorials **Success Criteria:** - 95% availability SLA demonstrated - Automated deployments in place - SOC 2 Type II certification audit initiated - Observability metrics available **Investment**: 8-10 person-quarters --- ### Phase 3: Intelligence (v3.0) **Timeline**: 2027 Q1 - Q2 (6 months) **Focus**: Intelligent automation, predictive analytics, self-healing. **Key Deliverables:** - Anomaly detection (ML-based) - Predictive scaling - Automated incident remediation - Multi-region deployment - AI-driven documentation - ISO 27001 certification **Success Criteria:** - 99.95% uptime achieved - Automated incident response active - Certification awarded - ML models in production **Investment**: 12-15 person-quarters --- ### Phase 4: Scale (v4.0+) **Timeline**: 2028 and beyond **Focus**: Multi-tenant support, advanced features, ecosystem. **Potential Deliverables:** - SaaS offering - Multi-tenant isolation - Advanced policy engine (Rego/OPA) - Plugin marketplace - Managed service offering --- ## Investment & Resources ### Current (v1.0) - **Team**: 4-5 engineers + 1 DevEx lead - **Burn Rate**: $200K-250K annually - **Focus**: Core product stability ### Phase 2 (v2.0) - **Team**: 6-8 engineers + 1 DevOps engineer + 1 Security engineer - **Burn Rate**: $400K-500K annually - **Focus**: Operations and compliance ### Phase 3 (v3.0) - **Team**: 8-10 engineers + 2 DevOps + 1 Data scientist - **Burn Rate**: $600K-800K annually - **Focus**: Intelligence and scale --- ## Success Metrics ### Reliability - Uptime: 99.9% → 99.95% → 99.99% - Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR): < 2 hours → < 15 min → < 1 min - Incident rate: < 1/week → < 1/month → preventive ### Security - Vulnerability response time: 7 days → 24 hours → 1 hour - Zero critical vulnerabilities (active) - Certifications: SOC 2 (v2.0) → ISO 27001 (v3.0) ### Observability - Query latency: N/A → < 1 second → < 100ms - Coverage: 70% → 90% → 95%+ ### Operability - Deployment time: 30 min → 5 min → < 1 min - Configuration effort: 1 hour → 15 min → automated ### Governance - Compliance score: 80% → 95% → 100% - Audit cycles: Manual → Semi-automated → Continuous ### Documentation - Page coverage: 85% → 95% → 100% - Example validation: Manual → CI/CD → Automated --- ## Stakeholder View ### For Executives - **v1.0**: Governance foundation, compliance baseline - **v2.0**: Operational credibility, SOC 2 readiness - **v3.0**: Enterprise-grade system, full compliance ### For Engineers - **v1.0**: Strong audit trail, clear architecture - **v2.0**: Easy deployment, observability - **v3.0**: Intelligent operations, self-healing ### For Security Teams - **v1.0**: Zero-trust, encrypted audit logs - **v2.0**: Compliance reporting, automated scanning - **v3.0**: Real-time threat detection, automation ### For Operations - **v1.0**: Documented procedures - **v2.0**: Automated deployments, dashboards - **v3.0**: Self-managing infrastructure --- ## How to Use This Model ### For Planning - Align PRs to roadmap phases - Prioritize work against levels - Justify new features by capability gap ### For Roadmapping - Identify capability gaps in your use case - Match to phases and timelines - Plan resource allocation ### For Evaluation - Assess ATLAS-GATE MCP fitness for your environment - Identify features you need - Understand commitment levels ### For Contributing - See where you can help - Target specific dimensions or phases - Coordinate with maintainers --- ## Questions & Feedback This roadmap is **not** set in stone. Community feedback shapes priorities: - **Unsure about a phase?** Open an issue - **Want to help?** See [CONTRIBUTING.md](../CONTRIBUTING.md) - **Disagree with priorities?** Start a discussion - **Have enterprise needs?** Contact security@atlas-gate-mcp.org --- **Last Updated**: 2026-01-21 **Next Review**: 2026-04-21