AutoDocs MCP Server

# AutoDocs Documentation Site Revision Project **Project Type**: Documentation Enhancement & Editorial Strategy **Start Date**: August 11, 2025 **Est. Duration**: 4-6 weeks **Priority**: High **Status**: Planning Complete, Ready for Execution ## Project Overview ### Mission Statement Transform the AutoDocs documentation site from functional-but-incomplete to a world-class example of technical documentation that serves multiple audiences while showcasing AI-assisted development methodology. ### Success Criteria - **Zero 404 errors** on mkdocs site - **Consistent editorial voice** across all documentation sections - **Clear navigation paths** for all user personas (beginners, developers, AI enthusiasts, contributors) - **Documentation becomes a reference model** for other AI-assisted projects ## Current State Analysis ### ✅ Strengths Discovered - **Complete file structure** - All referenced files exist (including all 4 journey phases) - **High-quality content** - Existing documentation is comprehensive and well-written - **Clear architecture** - Three-section structure (Product, Development, Journey) is logical - **Rich technical depth** - Journey section provides excellent development insights ### ❌ Issues Identified 1. **Missing Assets**: Empty `/docs/assets/` directory causing logo/favicon 404s 2. **Incomplete Cross-Linking**: Limited navigation between related sections 3. **Editorial Inconsistency**: No unified voice or content standards 4. **User Journey Gaps**: No clear paths for different user types ## Detailed Implementation Plan ## Phase 1: Immediate 404 Fixes **Duration**: 1 week **Priority**: Critical **Assignee**: Primary documentation maintainer ### Tasks - [ ] **1.1** Create placeholder assets in `/docs/assets/` - [ ] Add logo.png (can be simple placeholder initially) - [ ] Add favicon.ico (can be generated from logo) - [ ] Test mkdocs site build (`mkdocs serve`) - [ ] Verify no 404 errors in browser console - [ ] **1.2** Validate all internal links - [ ] Scan all `.md` files for internal link references - [ ] Test each link in rendered mkdocs site - [ ] Fix any broken cross-references - [ ] Document link validation process for future maintenance - [ ] **1.3** Verify external link validity - [ ] Test all external URLs (PyPI, GitHub, etc.) - [ ] Update any broken external references - [ ] Create external link monitoring checklist **Deliverables**: - ✅ Fully functional mkdocs site with zero 404s - 📋 Link validation checklist for ongoing maintenance --- ## Phase 2: Editorial Strategy Implementation **Duration**: 2 weeks **Priority**: High **Assignee**: Technical writer + Documentation maintainer ### Tasks - [ ] **2.1** Implement "Transparent Technical Storytelling" voice - [ ] Create editorial style guide document - [ ] Define consistent terminology and glossary - [ ] Establish writing standards (active voice, clarity-first, etc.) - [ ] Review all existing content for voice consistency - [ ] **2.2** Enhance Journey section with standardized template - [ ] Apply comprehensive phase template to all 4 phases: - [ ] The Challenge (context and problem statement) - [ ] Technical Implementation (architecture decisions) - [ ] Critical Decisions That Scaled (choices and rationale) - [ ] Validation Results (metrics and evidence) - [ ] Lessons Learned (what worked, challenges, solutions) - [ ] Impact on Subsequent Phases (evolution connection) - [ ] Add progression indicators showing phase evolution - [ ] Create phase-to-phase navigation links - [ ] **2.3** Create user persona navigation paths - [ ] **Curious Beginners**: Journey → Evolution → Product Getting Started - [ ] **Experienced Developers**: Product → Tools → Journey → Development - [ ] **AI Enthusiasts**: Journey → Methodology → Development → Journey Learnings - [ ] **Potential Contributors**: Development → Contributing → Journey Context → Development Standards - [ ] Add persona-specific landing pages or section intros **Deliverables**: - 📖 Editorial Style Guide document - 🔄 Enhanced Journey section with consistent templates - 🗺️ Clear user journey maps for different personas --- ## Phase 3: Content Quality Enhancement **Duration**: 2 weeks **Priority**: Medium **Assignee**: Technical writer + Subject matter expert ### Tasks - [ ] **3.1** Add technical depth throughout - [ ] Include more code examples and real-world scenarios - [ ] Add performance metrics and benchmarks where relevant - [ ] Create visual diagrams for complex architectural concepts - [ ] Enhance API examples with practical use cases - [ ] **3.2** Implement cross-section integration - [ ] Add contextual links between Product ↔ Journey ↔ Development - [ ] Create "related sections" recommendations - [ ] Implement "what to read next" suggestions - [ ] Add breadcrumb navigation where appropriate - [ ] **3.3** Improve content discoverability - [ ] Add search-friendly headers and keywords - [ ] Create topic tags or categories - [ ] Implement content cross-references - [ ] Add table of contents for longer documents **Deliverables**: - 🔗 Comprehensive cross-linking between all sections - 📊 Enhanced technical content with metrics and examples - 🔍 Improved content discoverability and navigation --- ## Phase 4: Advanced Features & Polish **Duration**: 1-2 weeks **Priority**: Low (nice-to-have) **Assignee**: UX specialist (if available) + Documentation maintainer ### Tasks - [ ] **4.1** Multi-format content enhancements - [ ] Add quick reference cards for common tasks - [ ] Create decision trees for choosing between tools - [ ] Develop troubleshooting flowcharts - [ ] Implement tabbed content for different environments - [ ] **4.2** Interactive elements (if mkdocs supports) - [ ] Add expandable sections for advanced topics - [ ] Include copy-to-clipboard for code examples - [ ] Create feedback collection mechanism - [ ] Add progress indicators for tutorial content **Deliverables**: - ⚡ Interactive and engaging documentation experience - 📋 User feedback collection system --- ## Quality Assurance & Standards ### Editorial Standards Implementation - **Writing Guidelines**: Clarity-first language, active voice, concrete examples - **Structure Standards**: Scannable format, progressive disclosure, clear visual hierarchy - **Code Standards**: Language tags, context explanations, working examples - **Diátaxis Framework Alignment**: - Journey: Explanation (understanding-oriented) - Product: Tutorials and How-to guides - Development: Reference with some How-to ### Review Process - [ ] Content review checklist for all changes - [ ] Cross-reference validation - [ ] User testing with different personas (when possible) - [ ] Regular content freshness audits ### Success Metrics #### Immediate (Phase 1-2) - [ ] Zero 404 errors on mkdocs site - [ ] Consistent editorial voice across all sections - [ ] Clear navigation paths for all user personas - [ ] Reduced time-to-information for common tasks #### Medium-term (Phase 3-4) - [ ] Improved user engagement metrics (if tracking available) - [ ] Reduced support questions due to better documentation - [ ] Positive community feedback on documentation quality - [ ] Increased contributor onboarding success rate #### Long-term Impact - [ ] Documentation becomes reference model for other AI-assisted projects - [ ] Strong reputation for documentation quality in the community - [ ] Self-sustaining documentation maintenance process ## Resource Requirements ### Human Resources - **Primary Documentation Maintainer** (project owner): 20-30 hours across 4-6 weeks - **Technical Writer Specialist**: 15-20 hours for editorial strategy and content review - **Subject Matter Expert**: 5-10 hours for technical accuracy review - **UX Specialist** (optional): 5-10 hours for Phase 4 enhancements ### Technical Resources - **mkdocs environment**: For testing and validation - **Asset creation tools**: For logo/favicon creation - **Link validation tools**: For ongoing maintenance - **Analytics tools** (optional): For measuring success metrics ## Risk Management ### Identified Risks 1. **Scope Creep**: Temptation to add more features than necessary - *Mitigation*: Strict adherence to phase priorities 2. **Content Consistency**: Multiple contributors creating inconsistent voice - *Mitigation*: Clear editorial guidelines and review process 3. **Technical Accuracy**: Outdated technical information - *Mitigation*: SME review and regular content audits ### Dependencies - **mkdocs environment**: Must be functional for testing - **Asset creation**: Need basic design resources for logo/favicon - **Content access**: All current maintainers need write access to docs/ ## Project Tracking ### Milestone Schedule - **Week 1**: Phase 1 Complete (404s fixed, site functional) - **Week 2-3**: Phase 2 Complete (editorial strategy implemented) - **Week 4-5**: Phase 3 Complete (content quality enhanced) - **Week 6**: Phase 4 Complete (advanced features added) ### Review Points - **Daily**: Progress check-ins during active development - **Weekly**: Milestone review and next-phase planning - **End of Phase 2**: Mid-project review and scope adjustment - **Project End**: Final review and handoff to ongoing maintenance --- **Next Steps**: 1. Review and approve this project plan 2. Set up project tracking in planning system 3. Assign team members to phases 4. Begin Phase 1 execution *Created: August 11, 2025* *Project Manager: [To be assigned]* *Last Updated: August 11, 2025*