Anti-Bullshit MCP Server

MIT License

Overview InspectNew Schema Related Servers Reviews Score

analyze_claim

Evaluate claims using frameworks like empirical, responsible, harmonic, or pluralistic to identify validation steps and ensure credible information.

Instructions

Analyze a claim using multiple epistemological frameworks and suggest validation steps

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`framework`	No	Validation framework to use (empirical, responsible, harmonic, or pluralistic)
`text`	Yes	Claim to analyze

Input Schema (JSON Schema)

{
  "properties": {
    "framework": {
      "description": "Validation framework to use (empirical, responsible, harmonic, or pluralistic)",
      "enum": [
        "empirical",
        "responsible",
        "harmonic",
        "pluralistic"
      ],
      "type": "string"
    },
    "text": {
      "description": "Claim to analyze",
      "type": "string"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "text"
  ],
  "type": "object"
}

You must be authenticated.

Other Tools from Anti-Bullshit MCP Server

Related Tools

validate_sources
@bmorphism/anti-bullshit-mcp-server
request-human-review-with-form
@gotohuman/gotohuman-mcp-server
ground_statement
@spences10/mcp-jinaai-grounding
octagon-financials-agent
@OctagonAI/octagon-mcp-server
validate_documentation_metadata
@alekspetrov/mcp-docs-service
ask_perplexity
@tanigami/mcp-server-perplexity

ID: isszli7z1y