# Specification Quality Checklist: VisualAI - Visual Assistant for Design and Assets
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2025-12-11
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
## Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [x] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [x] Success criteria are measurable
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [x] Edge cases are identified
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
## Validation Notes
### Content Quality Review
✅ **PASS** - Specification is written in plain language focusing on WHAT and WHY without HOW
- No specific technologies mentioned in requirements (only in constitution which is separate)
- User stories describe value and outcomes
- Acceptance scenarios use Given/When/Then format without implementation specifics
### Requirement Completeness Review
✅ **PASS** - All requirements are complete and testable
- Zero [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers (all informed decisions made using context)
- FR-001 through FR-025: Each requirement uses specific, measurable language (e.g., "under 5 minutes", "PNG primary, SVG for simple icons")
- Success Criteria SC-001 through SC-015: All include concrete metrics (e.g., "90% of users", "under 3 minutes", "95th percentile")
- All success criteria are technology-agnostic (no mention of React, TypeScript, databases)
### Feature Readiness Review
✅ **PASS** - Feature is ready for planning phase
- 3 user stories prioritized (P1, P2, P3) with independent test criteria
- Each user story has 3-5 concrete acceptance scenarios
- 8 edge cases identified covering error handling, boundary conditions, and failure scenarios
- Success criteria map directly to functional requirements (e.g., FR-001 maps to SC-001, FR-007 maps to SC-013)
- Out of Scope section clearly bounds Phase 1 scope
### Specific Validations
**User Scenarios**:
- ✅ P1 (Iterate on Figma Designs): 5 acceptance scenarios, independently testable
- ✅ P2 (Generate Professional Assets): 5 acceptance scenarios, independently testable
- ✅ P3 (Create Wireframes): 5 acceptance scenarios, independently testable
**Functional Requirements**:
- ✅ All 25 requirements use MUST language
- ✅ All requirements are verifiable (can be tested)
- ✅ No implementation details (Edit tool would flag violations)
**Success Criteria**:
- ✅ All 15 criteria are measurable with specific numbers
- ✅ All criteria are technology-agnostic
- ✅ Mix of quantitative (time, percentage, count) and qualitative (error recovery, context preservation)
**Edge Cases**:
- ✅ 8 edge cases covering: unsupported formats, contradictory requests, API failures, ambiguous inputs, large datasets, size limits, network failures, dimension constraints
## Overall Assessment
**Status**: ✅ **APPROVED FOR PLANNING**
**Rationale**: Specification demonstrates complete requirements documentation with no implementation details leaking, all requirements testable and unambiguous, success criteria measurable and technology-agnostic, and clear scope boundaries. Zero clarifications needed - all informed decisions documented in Assumptions section.
**Next Steps**:
1. Proceed to `/speckit.plan` for implementation planning
2. Use constitution principles (especially MVP-First) during planning
3. Reference this spec for all implementation decisions
