DollhouseMCP

# Comprehensive Security Audit Report **Project:** {{project_name}} **Version:** {{project_version}} **Audit Date:** {{audit_date}} **Auditor:** {{auditor_name}} **Audit ID:** {{audit_id}} **Scope:** {{audit_scope}} --- ## Executive Summary ### Overview {{#if executive_summary}} {{executive_summary}} {{else}} This comprehensive security audit evaluated {{project_name}} v{{project_version}} across multiple security domains including code security, dependency vulnerabilities, infrastructure configuration, cryptographic implementations, and MCP-specific attack vectors. {{/if}} ### Risk Assessment - **Overall Risk Level:** {{overall_risk_level}} - **Critical Findings:** {{critical_findings_count}} - **High Risk Findings:** {{high_findings_count}} - **Medium Risk Findings:** {{medium_findings_count}} - **Low Risk Findings:** {{low_findings_count}} ### Key Recommendations {{#if key_recommendations}} {{#each key_recommendations}} - {{priority}}: {{recommendation}} {{/each}} {{else}} 1. **Immediate Action Required:** Address all critical and high-risk vulnerabilities 2. **Short-term:** Implement missing security controls and update dependencies 3. **Long-term:** Establish continuous security monitoring and regular audits {{/if}} --- ## Audit Scope and Methodology ### Scope {{#if audit_scope_details}} {{audit_scope_details}} {{else}} This audit covered the following areas: - Source code security analysis (OWASP Top 10, CWE Top 25) - MCP-specific vulnerabilities (DMCP-SEC rules) - Dependency and supply chain security - Infrastructure and deployment security - Cryptographic implementation review - Error handling and information disclosure - Authentication and authorization mechanisms {{/if}} ### Methodology {{#if methodology}} {{methodology}} {{else}} The audit employed a combination of: - **Automated Security Scanning:** SecurityAuditor with comprehensive rule sets - **Manual Code Review:** Expert analysis of security-critical components - **Dependency Analysis:** npm audit and vulnerability database correlation - **Configuration Review:** Security settings and hardening assessment - **Threat Modeling:** Attack vector identification and risk assessment {{/if}} ### Tools Used {{#if tools_used}} {{#each tools_used}} - **{{name}}:** {{description}} (Version: {{version}}) {{/each}} {{else}} - **DollhouseMCP SecurityAuditor:** Integrated security scanning engine - **npm audit:** Dependency vulnerability detection - **GitHub Security Advisory:** CVE correlation and tracking - **Manual Analysis:** Expert security code review {{/if}} --- ## Security Findings Summary ### Findings by Severity | Severity | Count | Percentage | Risk Level | |----------|--------|------------|------------| | Critical | {{critical_findings_count}} | {{critical_percentage}}% | Immediate Action Required | | High | {{high_findings_count}} | {{high_percentage}}% | Fix Within 7 Days | | Medium | {{medium_findings_count}} | {{medium_percentage}}% | Fix Within 30 Days | | Low | {{low_findings_count}} | {{low_percentage}}% | Fix When Convenient | | Info | {{info_findings_count}} | {{info_percentage}}% | Informational | ### Findings by Category {{#if findings_by_category}} | Category | Count | Top Issue | |----------|--------|-----------| {{#each findings_by_category}} | {{category}} | {{count}} | {{top_issue}} | {{/each}} {{else}} | Category | Count | Top Issue | |----------|--------|-----------| | Code Security | 0 | None | | Dependencies | 0 | None | | Configuration | 0 | None | | MCP Security | 0 | None | | Infrastructure | 0 | None | {{/if}} ### Risk Scoring Matrix | Impact → | Low (1) | Medium (2) | High (3) | Critical (4) | |----------|---------|------------|----------|--------------| | **Unlikely (1)** | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | | **Possible (2)** | Low | Medium | Medium | High | | **Likely (3)** | Medium | Medium | High | Critical | | **Certain (4)** | Medium | High | Critical | Critical | --- ## Detailed Findings ### Critical Severity Issues {{#if critical_findings}} {{#each critical_findings}} #### {{rule_id}}: {{title}} - **Severity:** Critical - **CVSS Score:** {{cvss_score}} - **CWE/OWASP:** {{cwe_mapping}} / {{owasp_mapping}} - **File:** `{{file}}:{{line}}` - **Description:** {{description}} - **Impact:** {{impact}} - **Exploitability:** {{exploitability}} - **Remediation:** {{remediation}} - **Status:** {{status}} ```{{language}} {{code_snippet}} ``` **Recommended Fix:** ```{{language}} {{fix_snippet}} ``` --- {{/each}} {{else}} ✅ No critical severity issues found. {{/if}} ### High Severity Issues {{#if high_findings}} {{#each high_findings}} #### {{rule_id}}: {{title}} - **Severity:** High - **CVSS Score:** {{cvss_score}} - **CWE/OWASP:** {{cwe_mapping}} / {{owasp_mapping}} - **File:** `{{file}}:{{line}}` - **Description:** {{description}} - **Impact:** {{impact}} - **Remediation:** {{remediation}} - **Status:** {{status}} {{#if code_snippet}} ```{{language}} {{code_snippet}} ``` {{/if}} --- {{/each}} {{else}} ✅ No high severity issues found. {{/if}} ### Medium Severity Issues {{#if medium_findings}} | Rule ID | File | Issue | Status | |---------|------|-------|--------| {{#each medium_findings}} | {{rule_id}} | {{file}}:{{line}} | {{title}} | {{status}} | {{/each}} {{else}} ✅ No medium severity issues found. {{/if}} ### Low Severity and Informational Issues {{#if low_info_findings}} <details> <summary>Low Severity Issues ({{low_findings_count}})</summary> | Rule ID | File | Issue | Status | |---------|------|-------|--------| {{#each low_findings}} | {{rule_id}} | {{file}}:{{line}} | {{title}} | {{status}} | {{/each}} </details> <details> <summary>Informational Issues ({{info_findings_count}})</summary> | Rule ID | File | Issue | Status | |---------|------|-------|--------| {{#each info_findings}} | {{rule_id}} | {{file}}:{{line}} | {{title}} | {{status}} | {{/each}} </details> {{else}} ✅ No low severity or informational issues found. {{/if}} --- ## Security Domain Analysis ### 1. Code Security Analysis #### Injection Vulnerabilities {{#if injection_analysis}} {{injection_analysis}} {{else}} - **SQL Injection:** No direct SQL usage detected - **Command Injection:** Proper subprocess handling with array arguments - **Path Traversal:** File operations use proper path validation - **YAML Injection:** SecureYamlParser prevents unsafe deserialization - **Template Injection:** No template engines with unsafe user input {{/if}} #### Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) {{#if xss_analysis}} {{xss_analysis}} {{else}} - **DOM XSS:** No client-side DOM manipulation detected - **Reflected XSS:** Server-side MCP implementation, no web UI - **Stored XSS:** No persistent user content rendering {{/if}} #### Authentication & Authorization {{#if auth_analysis}} {{auth_analysis}} {{else}} - **Token Management:** OAuth implementation follows security best practices - **Session Handling:** Proper token expiration and rotation - **Permission Checks:** MCP tool permissions properly validated - **GitHub OAuth:** Secure OAuth flow implementation {{/if}} ### 2. MCP-Specific Security #### Persona Security (DMCP-SEC-001) {{#if persona_security}} {{persona_security}} {{else}} - **Prompt Injection:** ContentValidator properly sanitizes persona content - **Persona Validation:** SecureYamlParser prevents malicious YAML - **Trigger Security:** Activation mechanisms are properly isolated - **Content Isolation:** Personas cannot access system resources {{/if}} #### Skill & Agent Security {{#if skill_agent_security}} {{skill_agent_security}} {{else}} - **Skill Execution:** No arbitrary code execution capabilities - **Parameter Validation:** All inputs are properly sanitized - **Resource Limits:** No direct system resource access - **Sandbox Security:** Skills operate within MCP constraints {{/if}} #### Template & Memory Security {{#if template_memory_security}} {{template_memory_security}} {{else}} - **Template Security:** Variable injection properly handled - **Memory Isolation:** No cross-user data leakage - **Privacy Controls:** Appropriate access restrictions - **Data Lifecycle:** Proper retention and disposal policies {{/if}} ### 3. Dependency Security #### Vulnerability Analysis {{#if dependency_analysis}} {{dependency_analysis}} {{else}} - **Direct Dependencies:** {{direct_deps_count}} packages analyzed - **Transitive Dependencies:** {{transitive_deps_count}} packages scanned - **Known Vulnerabilities:** {{vuln_count}} identified - **License Compliance:** All licenses reviewed and approved {{/if}} #### Supply Chain Security {{#if supply_chain_analysis}} {{supply_chain_analysis}} {{else}} - **Package Integrity:** Lock files ensure reproducible builds - **Source Verification:** All packages from trusted repositories - **Update Strategy:** Regular security updates implemented - **Monitoring:** Automated vulnerability detection enabled {{/if}} ### 4. Infrastructure Security #### GitHub Security Configuration {{#if github_security}} {{github_security}} {{else}} - **Branch Protection:** Main branch properly protected - **Secret Management:** GitHub secrets properly configured - **Workflow Security:** Actions use pinned versions - **Access Controls:** Appropriate permissions configured {{/if}} #### CI/CD Security {{#if cicd_security}} {{cicd_security}} {{else}} - **Pipeline Security:** Workflows follow security best practices - **Build Security:** No secrets in build artifacts - **Deployment Security:** Secure release process - **Artifact Security:** Build outputs properly signed {{/if}} ### 5. Cryptographic Review #### Encryption & Hashing {{#if crypto_analysis}} {{crypto_analysis}} {{else}} - **Algorithm Selection:** Modern, secure algorithms used - **Key Management:** Proper key generation and storage - **Transport Security:** TLS/HTTPS properly implemented - **Token Security:** Cryptographically secure random generation {{/if}} ### 6. Error Handling & Logging #### Information Disclosure {{#if info_disclosure_analysis}} {{info_disclosure_analysis}} {{else}} - **Error Messages:** No sensitive information exposed - **Stack Traces:** Properly sanitized in production - **Debug Information:** Development artifacts excluded - **Version Disclosure:** Minimal version information exposed {{/if}} #### Logging Security {{#if logging_security}} {{logging_security}} {{else}} - **PII Protection:** Personal data properly redacted - **Secret Redaction:** Logger.sanitizeMessage prevents exposure - **Log Injection:** Format string vulnerabilities prevented - **Audit Trail:** Security events properly logged {{/if}} --- ## Remediation Plan ### Immediate Actions (Critical/High Risk) {{#if immediate_actions}} {{#each immediate_actions}} 1. **{{priority}}:** {{action}} (Target: {{deadline}}) - **Owner:** {{owner}} - **Effort:** {{effort}} - **Dependencies:** {{dependencies}} {{/each}} {{else}} ✅ No immediate actions required - no critical or high-risk issues found. {{/if}} ### Short-term Actions (Medium Risk) {{#if short_term_actions}} {{#each short_term_actions}} 1. **{{action}}** (Target: {{deadline}}) - **Rationale:** {{rationale}} - **Implementation:** {{implementation}} {{/each}} {{else}} ✅ No short-term actions required. {{/if}} ### Long-term Improvements (Low Risk/Preventive) {{#if long_term_actions}} {{#each long_term_actions}} 1. **{{action}}** (Target: {{deadline}}) - **Benefit:** {{benefit}} - **Priority:** {{priority}} {{/each}} {{else}} - Establish regular security review schedule - Implement automated security monitoring - Create security training program - Develop incident response procedures {{/if}} --- ## Compliance and Standards ### Security Standards Compliance {{#if compliance_analysis}} {{compliance_analysis}} {{else}} - **OWASP Top 10 (2021):** {{owasp_compliance_score}}/10 covered - **CWE Top 25:** {{cwe_compliance_score}}/25 addressed - **NIST Cybersecurity Framework:** {{nist_compliance_level}} - **SOC 2 Type I:** {{soc2_readiness}} {{/if}} ### MCP Security Standards {{#if mcp_compliance}} {{mcp_compliance}} {{else}} - **DMCP Security Rules:** All 10 rules implemented and tested - **Element Security:** Proper validation and isolation - **Tool Security:** Secure parameter handling - **Collection Security:** Safe content distribution {{/if}} --- ## Testing and Validation ### Security Test Coverage {{#if security_test_coverage}} {{security_test_coverage}} {{else}} - **Unit Tests:** {{unit_test_coverage}}% coverage of security functions - **Integration Tests:** {{integration_test_coverage}}% coverage of security flows - **Security Tests:** {{security_test_count}} specific security test cases - **Penetration Testing:** {{pentest_status}} {{/if}} ### Validation Results {{#if validation_results}} {{validation_results}} {{else}} - **Automated Scans:** {{auto_scan_pass_rate}}% pass rate - **Manual Review:** {{manual_review_completion}}% complete - **False Positive Rate:** {{false_positive_rate}}% - **Suppression Coverage:** {{suppression_coverage}}% of suppressions validated {{/if}} --- ## Suppression Analysis ### Suppression Summary {{#if suppression_summary}} {{suppression_summary}} {{else}} - **Total Suppressions:** {{total_suppressions}} - **Valid Suppressions:** {{valid_suppressions}} ({{valid_suppression_percentage}}%) - **Questionable Suppressions:** {{questionable_suppressions}} - **Overly Broad Suppressions:** {{broad_suppressions}} {{/if}} ### Suppression Categories {{#if suppression_categories}} | Category | Count | Validity | |----------|--------|----------| {{#each suppression_categories}} | {{category}} | {{count}} | {{validity_assessment}} | {{/each}} {{else}} | Category | Count | Validity | |----------|--------|----------| | Test Files | {{test_suppressions}} | ✅ Valid | | Security Modules | {{security_suppressions}} | ✅ Valid | | Type Definitions | {{type_suppressions}} | ✅ Valid | | Documentation | {{doc_suppressions}} | ✅ Valid | {{/if}} ### Suppression Recommendations {{#if suppression_recommendations}} {{#each suppression_recommendations}} - {{recommendation_type}}: {{description}} {{/each}} {{else}} - Review overly broad suppressions for specificity - Validate security module suppressions with expert review - Consider adding expiration dates to suppressions - Document suppression rationale more thoroughly {{/if}} --- ## Metrics and Trends ### Security Metrics {{#if security_metrics}} {{security_metrics}} {{else}} | Metric | Current Value | Target | Trend | |--------|---------------|--------|-------| | Critical Issues | {{critical_count}} | 0 | {{critical_trend}} | | High Issues | {{high_count}} | <3 | {{high_trend}} | | False Positive Rate | {{fp_rate}}% | <10% | {{fp_trend}} | | Scan Coverage | {{scan_coverage}}% | >95% | {{coverage_trend}} | | Remediation Time (Critical) | {{critical_mttr}} hours | <24h | {{mttr_trend}} | {{/if}} ### Historical Comparison {{#if historical_comparison}} {{historical_comparison}} {{else}} *This is the baseline security audit. Future audits will include trend analysis and historical comparisons.* {{/if}} --- ## Recommendations and Next Steps ### Security Posture Assessment {{#if security_posture}} {{security_posture}} {{else}} **Current Security Posture:** {{security_posture_level}} The organization demonstrates a strong commitment to security with comprehensive automated scanning, detailed suppression management, and proactive vulnerability management. The security audit framework is mature and well-implemented. {{/if}} ### Strategic Recommendations #### Immediate (0-30 days) {{#if immediate_recommendations}} {{#each immediate_recommendations}} 1. {{recommendation}} {{/each}} {{else}} 1. Address any critical or high-severity findings 2. Review and validate questionable suppressions 3. Update any outdated dependencies with known vulnerabilities 4. Ensure all security controls are properly documented {{/if}} #### Short-term (1-6 months) {{#if short_term_recommendations}} {{#each short_term_recommendations}} 1. {{recommendation}} {{/each}} {{else}} 1. Implement automated security monitoring dashboards 2. Establish regular security training for development team 3. Create incident response and breach notification procedures 4. Implement security champions program {{/if}} #### Long-term (6-12 months) {{#if long_term_recommendations}} {{#each long_term_recommendations}} 1. {{recommendation}} {{/each}} {{else}} 1. Pursue formal security certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) 2. Implement threat modeling for new features 3. Establish bug bounty program 4. Create security metrics dashboard and KPIs {{/if}} --- ## Appendices ### Appendix A: Detailed Tool Output <details> <summary>SecurityAuditor Raw Output</summary> ```json {{security_auditor_output}} ``` </details> <details> <summary>npm audit Results</summary> ```json {{npm_audit_output}} ``` </details> ### Appendix B: Suppression Configuration <details> <summary>Current Suppression Rules</summary> ```typescript {{suppression_config}} ``` </details> ### Appendix C: Security Rule Coverage <details> <summary>Implemented Security Rules</summary> {{#if security_rules}} {{#each security_rules}} - **{{rule_id}}:** {{description}} ({{status}}) {{/each}} {{else}} *Detailed security rule coverage analysis not available* {{/if}} </details> ### Appendix D: Test Results {{#if test_results}} {{test_results}} {{else}} *Security-specific test results and coverage analysis* {{/if}} --- ## Audit Metadata - **Audit Framework Version:** {{audit_framework_version}} - **SecurityAuditor Version:** {{security_auditor_version}} - **Scan Duration:** {{scan_duration_ms}}ms - **Files Scanned:** {{files_scanned}} - **Rules Applied:** {{rules_applied}} - **Suppression Rules:** {{suppression_rules_count}} - **Report Generated:** {{report_generation_time}} - **Next Audit Due:** {{next_audit_date}} --- *This comprehensive security audit report was generated using the DollhouseMCP SecurityAuditor framework and follows industry best practices for security assessment and reporting.*