CRITICAL_SECURITY_GAP_ANALYSIS.mdโข5.1 kB
# Critical Security Gap Analysis
## Executive Summary
**CRITICAL**: The current DollhouseMCP architecture performs ALL security validation on the client side, which can be completely bypassed by modifying the local MCP server code.
## The Problem
### Current State (Vulnerable)
```
User โ Local MCP Server โ [Local Validation] โ GitHub API โ Public Repository
โ โ
Can modify Can bypass
```
### Attack Scenario
```typescript
// Attacker modifies their local PersonaSharer.ts:
async sharePersona(persona: Persona): Promise<ShareResult> {
// Comment out all security checks
// this.validateContent(persona); // BYPASSED
// this.scanForMalicious(persona); // BYPASSED
// Directly submit malicious content
return this.submitToGitHub(maliciousPayload);
}
```
## Impact Assessment
### High Risk Scenarios
1. **Malicious Code Injection**
- Attacker bypasses local validation
- Injects malicious prompts/code
- Gets published to public marketplace
- Affects all users who install
2. **Token Theft**
- Embedded token-stealing prompts
- Exfiltration instructions
- Social engineering attacks
3. **Platform Reputation**
- One successful attack damages trust
- Media coverage of security breach
- User exodus
## Required Architecture (Secure)
```
User โ Local MCP โ Cloud API Gateway โ [Server Validation] โ GitHub API โ Repository
โ โ
Cannot modify Cannot bypass
```
## Immediate Action Plan
### Week 1: Emergency Measures
1. **Disable Direct GitHub Submission**
```typescript
// Temporary measure in PersonaSharer.ts
async submitPersona(persona: Persona): Promise<SubmitResult> {
throw new Error(
'Direct submission temporarily disabled. ' +
'Please use manual review process: security@dollhousemcp.com'
);
}
```
2. **Implement Manual Review Queue**
- Email-based submission
- Human review of all content
- Temporary but secure
### Week 2-3: Build Cloud API
1. **Minimal Viable API**
```typescript
// Simple Express API with validation
app.post('/api/v1/personas/submit',
authenticate,
rateLimit,
async (req, res) => {
const validation = await validateServerSide(req.body);
if (!validation.passed) {
return res.status(400).json({ errors: validation.errors });
}
// Only after validation passes
const result = await submitToGitHub(req.body);
return res.json(result);
}
);
```
2. **Deploy to Cloud**
- AWS Lambda + API Gateway, or
- Heroku, or
- Vercel/Netlify Functions
### Week 4: Migration
1. Update MCP server to use API
2. Require API key for submissions
3. Monitor all submissions
4. Gradual rollout
## Cost-Benefit Analysis
### Cost of NOT Fixing
- **Reputation**: Irreparable damage from first attack
- **Legal**: Potential liability for distributed malware
- **Users**: Loss of entire user base
- **Time**: Months to recover from incident
### Cost of Fixing
- **Development**: 2-4 weeks
- **Infrastructure**: ~$200-500/month
- **Maintenance**: Ongoing but manageable
## Recommended Immediate Actions
### 1. TODAY: Disable Direct Submission
```typescript
// In PersonaSharer.ts - TEMPORARY PATCH
if (!process.env.DOLLHOUSE_CLOUD_API_ENABLED) {
logger.error('Direct GitHub submission disabled for security');
return {
success: false,
message: 'Submissions temporarily require manual review. Email: security@dollhousemcp.com'
};
}
```
### 2. THIS WEEK: Communication
- Update documentation about temporary submission process
- Prepare security advisory (don't mention vulnerability details)
- Plan cloud API development
### 3. NEXT 2 WEEKS: Build API
- Simple validation API
- No fancy features initially
- Just secure the submission path
## Alternative: Delay Launch
If building the API isn't feasible immediately:
1. **Remove submission features entirely**
- Read-only marketplace
- No user submissions
- Launch as "curated collection"
2. **Manual curation only**
- Team adds personas
- Community suggests via issues
- Slow but secure
## Security Principles Violated
1. **Never Trust the Client**
- Current: Trusts local validation
- Required: Server validates everything
2. **Defense in Depth**
- Current: Single layer (client)
- Required: Multiple layers (client + server + monitoring)
3. **Principle of Least Privilege**
- Current: Direct GitHub access
- Required: Mediated through API
## Conclusion
**This is a CRITICAL security issue that MUST be fixed before public launch.**
Options:
1. **Best**: Build cloud API (2-4 weeks)
2. **Acceptable**: Disable submissions, launch read-only
3. **Unacceptable**: Launch with current architecture
The current architecture is equivalent to having a bank vault where customers can disable the lock from outside. No amount of client-side security can fix this fundamental flaw.
**Recommendation**: Pause launch, build API, then launch securely.