6amdev-server-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to 6amdev-server-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for managing Ubuntu/Linux systems, enabling AI assistants to execute commands, manage services, files, logs, and packages via local or SSH connection.-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for remote Linux server administration via SSH, integrating with Claude Code to manage Ubuntu/Debian servers.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI assistants to manage SSH terminal sessions, execute commands, and automate server operations through natural language, with multi-tab support and session persistence.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for managing Ubuntu servers over SSH. Enables Claude to check system health, inspect services, tail logs, review updates, and run commands remotely.8MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceA comprehensive MCP server integrating OpenAI GPT models for AI-powered tasks like code analysis, generation, and translation, along with system utilities, Docker management, network diagnostics, and web tools.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI assistants to securely operate remote servers via persistent SSH sessions, with tools for command execution, file transfer, directory listing, and system monitoring.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 34 tools
Tools are grouped by domain (system, docker, gitea, ollama, workspace, claude) which makes them fairly distinct. However, the system_* and docker_* tools have some overlap in purpose (e.g., system_status vs docker_stats both report resource usage), which could cause minor confusion for an agent.
All tool names use a consistent pattern of domain_prefix_action (e.g., docker_list, gitea_issues). This makes the set predictable. Minor inconsistency: the workspace tools use git as part of workspace_git rather than git_*, and claude tools are not prefixed uniformly (e.g., claude_ask vs claude_status).
With 34 tools, the server covers six domains, but this is on the heavy side for a single server. The claude and ollama domains add 5-6 tools each which feels excessive given that many tasks could be combined (e.g., claude_ask, claude_task, claude_review, claude_explain all serve similar purposes with vague boundaries).
Each domain has reasonable coverage: system has monitoring, docker has basic lifecycle, gitea has listing and issue creation, ollama has model management. Notable gaps: gitea lacks repo creation/update/deletion and commit reading; workspace lacks file deletion or listing by type; no tool for restarting services or managing users.