discord_create_webhook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds one important non-obvious detail: 'The webhook token is not returned.' With no annotations present, the description still does not disclose permission requirements, the fact that this is a persistent write operation, or other side effects. The single caveat is helpful but incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two short sentences, front-loads the main purpose, and only adds the essential caveat about the missing token. There is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a fairly simple create operation and the description warns about the most surprising return behavior. However, it lacks usage guidance, permission context, and any parameter elaboration. The output schema helps cover return values, but the agent is still under-informed about when and how to invoke this tool well.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the parameters (name, channel_id, reason, guild_id). Although the parameter names are fairly self-explanatory, the description provides no additional meaning beyond the schema, so it does not compensate for the lack of field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create a webhook') and the resource (a webhook). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like discord_edit_webhook, discord_delete_webhook, and discord_list_webhooks without needing to inspect the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus any of its siblings. It does not mention that it targets a specific channel, that channel_id is required, or when a user would prefer discord_list_webhooks or discord_edit_webhook instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.