discord_analyze_server

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must carry the full burden. It states 'Read the full guild map' which implies a read-only operation, and the phrase 'before making changes' reinforces non-destructive intent. Still, it doesn't explicitly declare no side effects, permissions, or rate limits, which is a gap for a zero-annotation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the tool's output and followed by usage guidance. No wasted words, though the parameter gap means the description could have used one more sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The output schema exists, so return format is covered. However, for a comprehensive analysis tool with overlapping siblings, the description lacks explicit distinctions from discord_server_structure and discord_server_info, and doesn't explain parameter effects (like include_members=false). Adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It makes no mention of guild_id or include_members, relying on self-explanatory names. This is insufficient for an agent to understand defaults, types, or optional behavior without opening the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific function: reading the full guild map including categories, channels, roles, members, bots, permission notes, and a summary. It distinguishes itself from collection-specific tools like discord_list_channels but could more sharply contrast with discord_server_structure and discord_server_info, which likely overlap.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly advises 'Prefer this when you need to understand the server structure before making changes,' which gives a clear usage context. However, it doesn't list alternatives or when not to use it, leaving some ambiguity with similar sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.