Set Range Domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare that this is a non-read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, non-open-world operation, but the description adds no behavioral context beyond the operation itself. It does not explain effects on existing domain values, required permissions, or any constraints, so it contributes little beyond the structured annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler. However, it is extremely terse and lacks internal structure that would help an agent parse the operation's components.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given four required parameters, 0% schema description coverage, and no output-schema explanation needed, the description is not complete enough for reliable invocation. It omits semantics for workspace_path and domain_name and does not clarify how this operation interacts with existing domains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate, but it only vaguely names the minimum and maximum values while ignoring the required domain_name and workspace_path parameters. No format, type, or expected value guidance is provided for any parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: setting the minimum and maximum values of a range domain. It is clear what the tool does, but it does not distinguish this operation from sibling domain tools such as alter_domain or create_domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool, when not to, or which alternative domain tool to choose. The description simply states the operation without any context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.