ArcGIS Pro MCP
Related Servers
Alternatives to ArcGIS Pro MCP
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that enables AI clients to read ArcGIS Pro project information and execute ArcPy geoprocessing in the native ArcGIS Pro Python environment.1384MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables safe local MCP-based control of ArcMap Desktop 10.8, allowing read-only inspection of map documents, layers, datasets, and execution of allowlisted geoprocessing tools through ArcPy.15-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables MCP-capable assistants to control an open ArcGIS Pro project locally over TCP 127.0.0.1, with 68 commands and 167 tools for layers, editing, symbology, layouts, geoprocessing, and arcpy execution.1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceUnified MCP server for ArcGIS Online and Enterprise providing tools for user/group management, item management, geoprocessing, feature layer queries/editing, and server administration.2MIT
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceSecure, local-first MCP server exposing ArcGIS Pro's ArcPy engine over stdio JSON-RPC.10015Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceLets AI assistants control a live ArcGIS Pro session through arcpy, including layer management, attribute queries, geoprocessing, symbology, and export.1129AGPL 3.0
TDQS
Scored across 458 tools
With 458 tools, there are many overlapping tools (e.g., numerous list_* tools, gp_* geoprocessing wrappers, and zoom/selection variants) and descriptions often repeat the tool name generically without clarifying boundaries. An agent cannot reliably distinguish which tool to use for a given task, leading to high misselection risk.
All names use snake_case with the arcgis_pro_ prefix, but the internal pattern varies between verb_noun, noun_phrase, and domain-prefixed (gp_, da_, na_, sdk_) conventions. While still readable, the lack of a single predictable verb_noun pattern across the set reduces consistency.
458 tools is an extreme mismatch for a single MCP server, far beyond the typical 3-15 range. Even for a complex GIS domain, this volume makes the toolset unwieldy and impossible for an agent to manage effectively.
The surface covers a vast range of ArcGIS Pro operations (project, map, layer, layout, geoprocessing, raster, network, editing, versioning, etc.), but some common lifecycle actions like creating a new project are missing. Overall it is very comprehensive with only minor gaps.