Skip to main content
Glama
652036

ArcGIS Pro MCP

by 652036
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to ArcGIS Pro MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • arcmap-10-8-mcp

      Stella8758
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables safe local MCP-based control of ArcMap Desktop 10.8, allowing read-only inspection of map documents, layers, datasets, and execution of allowlisted geoprocessing tools through ArcPy.
      15
      3
      -

    • arcgis-pro-mcp-free

      IngKevinDavid
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-capable assistants to control an open ArcGIS Pro project locally over TCP 127.0.0.1, with 68 commands and 167 tools for layers, editing, symbology, layouts, geoprocessing, and arcpy execution.
      1
      MIT

    • ArcGIS MCP

      renemorenow
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Unified MCP server for ArcGIS Online and Enterprise providing tools for user/group management, item management, geoprocessing, feature layer queries/editing, and server administration.
      2
      MIT

    • ArcGIS Pro MCP

      Knight60
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Lets AI assistants control a live ArcGIS Pro session through arcpy, including layer management, attribute queries, geoprocessing, symbology, and export.
      112
      15
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.2/5.0

    Scored across 458 tools

    Disambiguation1/5

    With 458 tools, there are many overlapping tools (e.g., numerous list_* tools, gp_* geoprocessing wrappers, and zoom/selection variants) and descriptions often repeat the tool name generically without clarifying boundaries. An agent cannot reliably distinguish which tool to use for a given task, leading to high misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All names use snake_case with the arcgis_pro_ prefix, but the internal pattern varies between verb_noun, noun_phrase, and domain-prefixed (gp_, da_, na_, sdk_) conventions. While still readable, the lack of a single predictable verb_noun pattern across the set reduces consistency.

    Tool Count1/5

    458 tools is an extreme mismatch for a single MCP server, far beyond the typical 3-15 range. Even for a complex GIS domain, this volume makes the toolset unwieldy and impossible for an agent to manage effectively.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a vast range of ArcGIS Pro operations (project, map, layer, layout, geoprocessing, raster, network, editing, versioning, etc.), but some common lifecycle actions like creating a new project are missing. Overall it is very comprehensive with only minor gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources