Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to dos-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      MCP server for reverse engineering Windows executables and related binary formats, offering static analysis, Ghidra-assisted function recovery, plugin-driven tooling, and optional isolated Windows runtime execution.
      3 npm
      241
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server enables AI agents to inspect and control the native DOSBox-X debugger through bounded MCP tools, including breakpoint management, execution control, register/memory inspection, and disassembly for DOS program debugging and reverse engineering.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Bridges AI agents to a DOSBox emulator, enabling control of DOS programs via MCP tools for typing, screen reading, video capture, Lua scripting, and memory access.
      3
      GPL 2.0
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables an MCP client to observe and control a text-mode DOS system via a Python bridge, supporting keyboard input and screen capture.
      8
      -

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 13 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool targets a distinct emulator function, but the input-related tools (send_keys, key_event, type_text) are somewhat similar in purpose. The descriptions clarify the differences, but an agent might occasionally confuse send_keys with key_event.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tools consistently use the dosbox_ prefix and snake_case. Most use an imperative verb (capture, save, load, pause, resume, reset, swap, break, send, type, read), but a few are nouns (status, key_event), which is a minor deviation.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 13 tools, the server covers the key aspects of DOSBox control—state, input, display, memory, and execution—without being bloated. The count feels well-scoped for an emulator control surface.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core emulator operations such as state save/load, screen capture, keyboard input, and memory reads. Minor gaps exist, such as mouse control or disk image management, but the surface is largely sufficient for typical DOSBox automation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues