Safe MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Safe MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI signing agents to pre-flight transactions by checking ERC-7730 descriptor safety, explaining function semantics, and scanning contracts for danger primitives.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server that lets any AI agent operate a wallet directly on-chain: create wallets, send, swap, bridge, and deploy contracts across EVM and Bitcoin networks.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceThis MCP server provides authentication via wallet sign-in (SIWE) and authorization with scoped access to read and trade portfolios, enabling secure portfolio management through natural language.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA read-only MCP server that lets you interact with the Ethereum blockchain via natural language, providing tools for reading blocks, transactions, token metadata, events, and more, with provenance tracking and no private key access.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Hermes Agent to the Solana blockchain, enabling natural language queries for wallets, tokens, NFTs, transactions, whale movements, and network health.6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that connects Claude for Desktop with blockchain functionality, allowing users to check balances and send tokens on EVM and Solana chains through natural language interactions.-
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: decodeTransactionData handles data decoding, getMultisigTransaction retrieves a specific transaction, and getSafeTransactions lists all transactions for a Safe. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with camelCase (e.g., decodeTransactionData, getMultisigTransaction). However, the verb 'get' is used for two tools while 'decode' is used for one, which is a minor deviation from perfect uniformity.
With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a Safe MCP server, as it lacks operations like creating or executing transactions, which are core to multisig workflows. The count is borderline for the apparent scope of Safe management.
The tool surface is significantly incomplete for Safe management, missing essential CRUD operations such as creating, proposing, or executing transactions. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform full lifecycle actions on Safes.