Skip to main content
Glama
5ajaki

Safe MCP Server

by 5ajaki

Related Servers

Alternatives to Safe MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that enables AI signing agents to pre-flight transactions by checking ERC-7730 descriptor safety, explaining function semantics, and scanning contracts for danger primitives.
      4
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      This MCP server provides authentication via wallet sign-in (SIWE) and authorization with scoped access to read and trade portfolios, enabling secure portfolio management through natural language.
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that lets you interact with the Ethereum blockchain via natural language, providing tools for reading blocks, transactions, token metadata, events, and more, with provenance tracking and no private key access.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects Claude for Desktop with blockchain functionality, allowing users to check balances and send tokens on EVM and Solana chains through natural language interactions.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: decodeTransactionData handles data decoding, getMultisigTransaction retrieves a specific transaction, and getSafeTransactions lists all transactions for a Safe. There is no overlap in functionality, making tool selection straightforward.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern with camelCase (e.g., decodeTransactionData, getMultisigTransaction). However, the verb 'get' is used for two tools while 'decode' is used for one, which is a minor deviation from perfect uniformity.

    Tool Count3/5

    With only 3 tools, the set feels thin for a Safe MCP server, as it lacks operations like creating or executing transactions, which are core to multisig workflows. The count is borderline for the apparent scope of Safe management.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is significantly incomplete for Safe management, missing essential CRUD operations such as creating, proposing, or executing transactions. This will likely cause agent failures when trying to perform full lifecycle actions on Safes.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues