stop_gpu_monitor
Stop GPU monitoring initiated by start_gpu_monitor to free system resources.
Instructions
Stops a GPU monitor started by start_gpu_monitor.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | gpu |
Stop GPU monitoring initiated by start_gpu_monitor to free system resources.
Stops a GPU monitor started by start_gpu_monitor.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | gpu |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description does not disclose behavioral traits like idempotency, error handling, or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: one sentence with no fluff, directly communicates the action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple stop operation but lacks details on return value, side effects, or necessary prerequisites; no output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Single parameter 'name' with default 'gpu' is not explained; description fails to clarify its role (which monitor to stop) despite 0% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states it stops a GPU monitor started by start_gpu_monitor, with a specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly links to start_gpu_monitor but lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/404F0X/better_colab_MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server