rerun_env_setup_cells

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It states the core behavior (reruns persisted cells) but does not disclose potential side effects, error conditions, or dependencies beyond 'persist=true'. The behavior is straightforward for a simple tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single focused sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose. No extraneous text. Ideal conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity, the description is largely complete. It explains what it does and the prerequisite. Missing details like return value or behavior of missing markerName, but the schema covers parameters. Slightly above average.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: rerunning persisted environment setup cells. It uses a specific verb ('Reruns') and identifies the resource ('persisted environment setup cells') and the condition ('created by set_env_vars with persist=true'). This distinguishes it from siblings like set_env_vars or run_code_cell.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage after set_env_vars with persist=true, but does not explicitly state when to use or not use this tool, nor does it mention alternatives. For example, it could clarify that this tool is not for initial setup or for running arbitrary cells.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.