task_status
Retrieve the status of an asynchronous task using its unique task ID to check progress or completion.
Instructions
Get the status of an async task
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | The task ID to check |
Retrieve the status of an asynchronous task using its unique task ID to check progress or completion.
Get the status of an async task
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| taskId | Yes | The task ID to check |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnly, idempotent, non-destructive; description adds no further behavioral details (e.g., error handling, status values).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, but could be expanded with key details without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with one parameter and no output schema; description covers basic purpose but lacks info on return values or possible statuses.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters; description does not add extra meaning beyond the schema's description of taskId.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The name and description clearly state the tool gets the status of an async task, distinguishing it from siblings like task_list and task_cancel.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives; no context about async task lifecycle or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/21967201/mcp-enhanced-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server