Skip to main content
Glama
21967201

MCP Enhanced Server

by 21967201
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Enhanced Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • aether-mcp

      alrazihi
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides system utilities, file operations, data tools, creative idea generation, and dynamic resources via MCP, with auth support for bearer tokens and OAuth.
      16 npm
      1
      MIT

    • maic-server-fs-mcp

      maicFir
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides LLMs with local filesystem operations (read/write files, list directories) and command execution via MCP, enabling file management and task automation within AI clients.
      7
      9 npm
      ISC

    • fsext-mcp-server-python

      kurtzhi
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A full-featured secure MCP server for local file system operations, with built-in image processing, OCR and media tools. Fully compliant with the official Model Context Protocol specification, offering standardized request/response schemas, large-file streaming I/O, multi-transport remote deployment, and comprehensive text search & replace functionality for LLM agent integration.
      22
      Apache 2.0
    • fieldcure-mcp-essentials by fieldcure

      fieldcure-mcp-essentialsofficial

      fieldcure
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides 20 essential tools including HTTP requests, web search, file I/O, shell commands, and persistent memory for any MCP client, with zero configuration required.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, but the presence of get_weather and system_info alongside file and task management tools creates ambiguity about the server's core domain, potentially confusing an agent.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools use a verb_noun pattern (e.g., read_file, list_directory), but several tools like task_status and system_info use noun_noun, breaking the pattern. The mix is readable but inconsistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    15 tools is a reasonable count, but the inclusion of get_weather and system_info seems extraneous for the implied focus on file and task management, making the set feel slightly over-scoped.

    Completeness2/5

    File operations lack create directory, move, and copy; task management lacks a create_task tool (tasks are only created via batch_process). These gaps could cause agent failures in common workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources