frida_remove_remote

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the action without disclosing side effects, prerequisites (e.g., whether the server must be connected), error behavior, or whether the remote device is removed from the manager.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no redundancy, earning high marks for structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple operation, the description is minimal but lacks behavioral context about what happens on disconnect (e.g., removal from device list) and no parameter semantics. With no annotations, it feels incomplete for an agent to invoke correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has a `host` string and `port` integer with default 27042, but the description provides no explanation of these parameters. Coverage is 0%, and the description fails to clarify that host is the server address and port is the frida-server port.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Disconnect' and the resource 'remote Frida server', clearly indicating the tool's action. It distinguishes from frida_detach by specifying remote server, but it doesn't clarify the relationship to the tool's name 'remove_remote', which may imply removing a configured device rather than just disconnecting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives. The use case is implied by the description—when a user wants to disconnect from a remote server—but no alternatives or exclusions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.