frida_disable_child_gating

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only states the action and a prerequisite, without revealing side effects, reversibility, or impact on the session and its child processes. This is insufficient for a mutating tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with the action stated first and the argument explained in a clear Args block. Every sentence is informative, with no redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter tool with an output schema, the description covers the core purpose and parameter meaning. It misses some behavioral context, but overall is adequate for invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds meaning to the pid parameter by explaining it as the target process PID and specifying the active session requirement, which goes beyond the schema's bare integer type. This is valuable, but could be more explicit about validation or expected state.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool disables child gating on a session, specifying the exact action and resource. It differentiates from siblings like enable_child_gating and disable_spawn_gating through the specific term 'child gating'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it (when you have an active session) but provides no explicit comparison to alternatives such as disable_spawn_gating or enable_child_gating. The prerequisite 'must have active session' gives some context but not a full usage guide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.