Skip to main content
Glama

万忆跨域桥接

Abstract lessons from trading, writing, and coding into cross-domain patterns, then bridge them to surface analogous warnings for current decisions.

Instructions

护城河#3「跨域类比迁移」:把交易/写作/开发各领域的教训抽象成跨域底层模式,然后跨域桥接——让交易的教训自动提醒写作/开发,反之亦然。BLOCK/CAUTION拦截时自动联动。abstract沉淀模式(abstract_name+essence+keywords)、bridge给定当前决策找跨域同构模式、list_patterns按命中率列出、get看详情。

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNo返回条数上限
actionNobridge/abstract/list_patterns/getbridge
domainNo当前领域:trade/write/code/otherother
essenceNoabstract必填:底层本质描述(跨域通用)
keywordsNoabstract可选:触发关键词数组
pattern_idNoget必填:模式ID
source_refNoabstract可选:来源记忆ID/分支ID
abstract_nameNoabstract必填:跨域模式名(如'无视止损纪律')
decision_textNobridge必填:当前决策/场景描述

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

没有annotations,描述承担了主要行为披露责任;它说明了跨域桥接、BLOCK/CAUTION自动联动、按命中率列表、查看详情等行为,比完全沉默好。但未说明abstract沉淀模式是否有持久化副作用、bridge返回什么结构、get和list失败时的行为,行为透明度仍不完整。

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

两句话覆盖了四个子操作和核心跨域迁移逻辑,信息密度高,动作列举紧凑,没有明显冗余。缺点是「护城河#3」和未解释的BLOCK/CAUTION术语占用了一定理解成本,但整体仍算精简。

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

在无output schema、无annotations的情况下,描述覆盖了四个action的主要用途和参数约束,并暗示了部分返回行为(如list_patterns按命中率、get看详情)。但缺少对输出形状、limit如何应用、domain如何筛选、以及抽象模式后是否返回ID或确认信息等说明,对一个9参数的多模式工具来说只是刚好够用。

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

input-schema对所有9个参数都有描述,且已经标注了abstract必填、bridge必填、get必填等条件,因此description无需重复基础语义。描述额外将参数组合归入四个action,便于快速理解调用姿势,但未补充limit作用范围、domain如何影响bridge结果等更深层语义,价值有限。

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

描述明确说明工具的核心动作:把交易/写作/开发各领域的教训抽象成跨域底层模式,再进行跨域桥接,并能与兄弟工具如「万忆经验库」「万忆图谱搜索」区分开。但开头「护城河#3」和使用BLOCK/CAUTION这类内部术语,使整体表达不够口语化,且未直接对比任一兄弟工具,因此未到5分。

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

描述按action列举了abstract、bridge、list_patterns、get各自的用途与参数组合,并提到BLOCK/CAUTION拦截时自动联动,提供了可执行的调用语境。但没有明确说明何时应优先使用本工具而非其他记忆工具,也没有给出when-not或替代工具的显式指引。

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/17861102832/wanyimem'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server