mcp-summarizer
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Server capabilities have not been inspected yet.
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| summarizeD | – |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'summarize' has no competing alternatives within this server, making disambiguation trivial.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency, as there are no other tools to compare it against. The name 'summarize' follows a clear verb pattern, but consistency cannot be assessed across a set of one.
One tool is too few for most practical server purposes, as it severely limits functionality and scope. For a summarizer, this feels thin and incomplete, lacking operations like list_summaries, get_summary, or customize_summary that would enhance utility.
The server is severely incomplete for a summarizer domain. With only a single 'summarize' tool and no description, there are obvious gaps: no way to retrieve, update, delete, or list summaries, and no coverage of related operations like configuration or batch processing.