Skip to main content
Glama
0xjcf

CodeAnalysis MCP Server

by 0xjcf
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to CodeAnalysis MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Codex MCP Server

      hailangx
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for local repository indexing and code understanding, enabling semantic search, AST analysis, dependency tracking, and symbol resolution.
      1,196 npm
      ISC

    • code-graph-rag-mcp

      er77
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A powerful Model Context Protocol server that creates intelligent graph representations of your codebase with comprehensive semantic analysis capabilities, supporting 11 languages and 26 MCP methods.
      13 npm
      122
      MIT
    • CodeAlive MCP by CodeAlive-AI

      CodeAlive MCPofficial

      CodeAlive-AI
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enhances AI agents by providing deep semantic understanding of codebases, enabling more intelligent interactions through advanced code search and contextual awareness.
      90
      MIT

    • Codebase MCP Server

      cmaujean
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that analyzes application codebases with real-time file watching, providing AI assistants like Claude with deep insights into project structure, code patterns, and architecture.
      MIT

    • CodeCompass MCP

      TheAlchemist6
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An enterprise-grade Model Context Protocol server that provides comprehensive GitHub repository analysis and AI-powered development assistance through 11 streamlined tools.
      11
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    D1.5/5.0

    Scored across 28 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Multiple tools have unclear boundaries and overlapping purposes, such as analyze-files, analyze-repository, and project-info, which could all relate to codebase analysis, and analyze-metrics versus calculate-metrics, which seem redundant. The lack of descriptions exacerbates this ambiguity, making it difficult for an agent to distinguish between similar-sounding tools like visualize-code-structure and visualize-dependencies.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming shows mixed conventions: most tools use kebab-case (e.g., analyze-cursor, build-knowledge-graph), but some deviate with underscores (e.g., cross-repo-analysis, socio-technical-analysis) or inconsistent verb styles (e.g., analyze-* versus get-* versus list-*). While readable, the patterns are not fully consistent, leading to a moderate score.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 28 tools, this server feels heavy and potentially over-scoped for code analysis, suggesting redundancy or fragmentation. A typical well-scoped server might have 3-15 tools; this count is borderline excessive, indicating a lack of focus that could overwhelm agents and reduce usability.

    Completeness3/5

    Inferring the domain as code analysis, the tool set covers aspects like analysis, metrics, knowledge graphs, and visualization, but there are notable gaps. For example, it lacks clear CRUD operations for core entities beyond insights (e.g., no update or delete for sessions), and the overlap in analysis tools suggests incomplete coverage rather than a streamlined workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources