Create Reminder
reminders_createSchedule a reminder by specifying its title, optional notes, due date, and calendar list.
Instructions
Create a reminder.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | ||
| notes | No | ||
| dueDate | No | ||
| calendarId | No |
reminders_createSchedule a reminder by specifying its title, optional notes, due date, and calendar list.
Create a reminder.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | ||
| notes | No | ||
| dueDate | No | ||
| calendarId | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior but only states a vague action. It omits effects, authorization needs, and whether it creates a system reminder or a database entry.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Despite being only 4 words, the description fails to provide necessary information. Conciseness is not beneficial when it sacrifices all utility.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 4 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% parameter description coverage, and the description adds no meaning to any of the 4 parameters (title, notes, dueDate, calendarId). The agent has no information on format or constraints.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Create a reminder.' is a tautology, restating the tool name without adding specificity. It fails to distinguish this tool from siblings like 'reminders_list' or 'reminders_complete'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not provide context for appropriate use cases or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/0xatrilla/Apple-MCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server