Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to webclaw

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    🚀 Active Fork of executeautomation/mcp-playwright This repository is an actively maintained continuation of the original MCP Playwright server: >👉 https://github.com/executeautomation/mcp-playwright A Model Context Protocol server that provides browser automation capabilities using Playwright.
    32
    7,757 npm
    1
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Web scraping, crawling, and structured data extraction for AI agents. 5 tools: scrape (clean markdown from any URL), crawl (entire sites), map (discover URLs), extract (structured JSON), and search. 833ms avg latency, single binary, self-hostable.
    8
    1,172
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents to extract clean, structured web content (articles, tables, links, visual layouts) optimized for LLM token efficiency, with fast response times and optional JavaScript support.
    5
    38 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and LLM pipelines to fetch webpages or crawl sites, extract main content, and convert it into clean Markdown with links preserved while minimizing token use.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Web scraping for AI agents: scrape, map, crawl and batch public pages into Markdown, tables and JSON, with an Evidence Record on every page. Blocked, empty and wrong pages come back as such, with the reason.
    39
    2
    AGPL 3.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and LLM pipelines to fetch and crawl web pages, extract readable content, and convert it into clean Markdown with preserved links while minimizing token usage.
    MIT

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Scored across 10 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some potential overlap between 'extract' (structured data via LLM) and 'scrape' (content extraction in various formats), which could cause confusion. Other tools like 'brand', 'diff', 'map', and 'summarize' are clearly specialized, helping to minimize misselection.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent pattern of single, descriptive verbs (e.g., batch, brand, crawl, diff, extract, map, research, scrape, search, summarize). There are no mixed conventions or deviations, making the set predictable and easy to navigate.

Tool Count5/5

With 10 tools, the count is well-scoped for a web scraping and research server. Each tool appears to serve a specific function in the domain, from basic scraping to advanced research, without feeling excessive or insufficient for the intended purpose.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers a broad range of web-related operations, including extraction, crawling, searching, and analysis. Minor gaps exist, such as the lack of explicit update or delete operations for stored data, but these are not critical for the server's primary focus on content retrieval and processing.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessResponsive