vsz_get_zone

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full responsibility for disclosing behavior. 'Get' implies a read-only operation, but the description does not explicitly state that it has no side effects, requirements for permissions, or behavior on invalid zone IDs. It is minimally adequate but lacks behavioral detail.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with the core purpose in the first sentence, followed by a concise parameter list. No wasted words, and the structure is suitable for tool documentation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with an output schema present, the description covers the essential inputs and purpose. It lacks error handling details and explicit differentiation from sibling tools, but the output schema for return values reduces the need for that information. Overall it is adequate for the tool's complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero description coverage, but the description compensates by explaining both parameters: 'host: vSZ controller IP or hostname' and 'zone_id: Zone UUID'. This adds meaningful semantic context beyond the bare schema titles, making parameter usage clear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get detailed information about a specific zone' clearly identifies the action (get) and resource (zone), and the modifier 'specific' distinguishes it from list/create/update/delete operations. This is a standard get-by-ID tool and the purpose is immediately unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like vsz_list_zones or when not to use it. It only states the parameters, leaving the agent to infer that zone_id is required for a single-zone lookup. No exclusions or alternative tool references are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.