vsz_enable_disable_wlan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It only states the toggle action and parameter semantics, but does not disclose side effects, permissions, whether changes are immediate, or any other behavioral traits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single clear action sentence followed by a structured Args list. There is no redundant text, and the most important information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple toggle operation, the action and parameters are covered, but with no annotations the description lacks contextual details like permissions, immediate effects, or validation requirements. An output schema exists, so return value documentation is unnecessary, yet minimal usage context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides only types and titles with 0% description coverage. The description compensates fully by explaining each argument: host as controller IP/hostname, zone_id and wlan_id as UUIDs, and enabled as True/False for enabling/disabling.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Enable or disable a WLAN,' clearly identifying the specific action on a specific resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create/update/delete/list/get WLAN.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as vsz_update_wlan or vsz_get_wlan. No prerequisites, conditions, or exclusions are mentioned, leaving the agent without usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.