Skip to main content
Glama

PJQ — Public Judgment Quotient

Server Details

Observatory of public media reception: classify YouTube comments for mood, support and controversy.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
Makaric/pjq
GitHub Stars
0

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. 7 tool updates
    • First observedcontroversial_videos
    • First observedmood_matrix
    • First observedvideo_classify
    • First observedvideo_exemplars
    • First observedvideo_history
    • First observedvideo_verdict
    • First observedvideos_list

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: finding controversial videos, aggregating mood snapshots, running classification, retrieving exemplar quotes, viewing history, listing canon videos, and getting the latest verdict. No two tools appear to serve the same purpose.

Naming Consistency2/5

Naming conventions are mixed: some tools use 'video_' prefix (video_classify, video_history, video_verdict), others don't (controversial_videos, mood_matrix). Verb usage is inconsistent ('video_classify' uses a verb, others are noun-phrases), and singular/plural varies ('video_verdict' vs 'videos_list').

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped for a domain focused on analyzing public judgment on YouTube videos. Each tool addresses a distinct need without being excessive or minimal.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the core pipeline: classify a video, view its verdict, cite exemplars, track history, list all videos, and aggregate mood. Minor gaps exist such as the absence of update/delete operations or a direct single-video metadata endpoint, but these are not critical for the stated purpose.