RSS Keyword Monitor
Server Details
Search bounded RSS, Atom, and RDF feed matches by keyword or regex.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- Telemark-Digital/apify-monitoring-workflows
- GitHub Stars
- 0
Available Tools
1 tooluplifted_novice_vbl--rss-keyword-monitor-only-newRSS, Atom, and RDF keyword monitorAInspect
Run the Apify RSS monitor for scheduled keyword, regex, and exclusion alerts across RSS, Atom, and RDF feeds. Returns only new matching feed items by default and can POST to a webhook.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| feeds | No | RSS, Atom, or RDF feed URLs to monitor. | |
| onlyNew | No | When true, return only items not previously delivered by this saved Task. | |
| keywords | No | Case-insensitive keywords or phrases. Empty returns every new item. | |
| resetState | No | Reset the saved seen-set and HTTP validators once, then turn it off. | |
| webhookUrl | No | Optional webhook endpoint that receives a summary and up to 50 newest matched items. | |
| dedupWindow | No | Days an item remains in the seen-set before it can be delivered again. | |
| matchFields | No | Feed item fields to search: title, description, content, and categories. | |
| excludeTerms | No | Case-insensitive terms that remove matched items before delivery and billing. | |
| regexPatterns | No | Case-insensitive regular expressions, OR-matched with keywords. | |
| includeContent | No | Include full content:encoded HTML from the feed when present. | |
| maxItemsPerRun | No | Maximum feed items delivered and charged in one run. |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations declare openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds some behavior by noting the default only-new behavior and webhook POST capability, though these mostly paraphrase schema fields. It does not mention state reset behavior, dedup windows, or billing implications, but the annotations already provide a basic safety profile.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no redundant words; it front-loads the core purpose, then states the key default and a notable side effect. Every phrase earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has 11 optional parameters, full schema coverage, and no output schema, the description captures the essential use case and default behavior. An agent can correctly invoke the tool with the schema alone, and the description adds sufficient high-level context for scheduling and alerting.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, and each parameter already has meaningful descriptions (e.g., feeds, onlyNew, keywords, resetState, webhookUrl). The tool description adds no parameter-level detail beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb and resource: 'Run the Apify RSS monitor' for keyword, regex, and exclusion alerts across RSS, Atom, and RDF feeds. It also clarifies the default behavior ('Returns only new matching feed items') and optional webhook delivery, making the tool's purpose clear even without sibling comparisons.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides clear context for when to use the tool: it is a scheduled, ongoing monitor that filters RSS/Atom/RDF feed items by keywords and regex. There are no sibling tools to distinguish against, and no explicit exclusions, but the use case is effectively conveyed.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Search bounded public Bluesky keywords, handles, mentions, and hashtags.
RSS, Atom and JSON feeds for agents: find a site's feed, read items as JSON, keyless news search.
Read, search and track your RSS feeds: semantic search, story clustering, watches, OPML import.
Track and browse RSS feeds with ease. Fetch the latest entries from any feed URL and extract full…
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceFetches and searches structured JSON feeds from 7 tech sources including GeekNews, Hacker News, and arXiv.17MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to browse and read curated software-development feeds, fetch any RSS/Atom/RDF feed via URL, and filter items by keywords.15MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables listing, reading, and fetching curated law and courts RSS/Atom feeds with keyword filtering and fallback proxy support.12MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides tools to list, read, and fetch RSS/Atom feeds, with curated categories and robust fetching capabilities.15MIT
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
Only one tool exists, so there is no chance of confusing it with another tool. The description clearly explains the tool's purpose despite the unusual name.
The single tool name uses a random prefix and hyphens, and does not follow a verb_noun pattern. It is readably descriptive after the prefix, but the overall name is unconventional and not typical of a well-designed tool set.
One tool is below the typical 3-15 range, but for the narrow purpose of RSS keyword monitoring, this single comprehensive tool can handle the core workflow. The count is slightly under but reasonable for the stated scope.
The tool covers the essential monitoring workflow: running the monitor, filtering by keywords/regex/exclusions, returning new items, and posting to a webhook. There is no explicit management of monitor configurations, but the tool parameters seem sufficient for the primary use case.