Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Search bounded public Bluesky keywords, handles, mentions, and hashtags.

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
Telemark-Digital/apify-monitoring-workflows
GitHub Stars
0

Available Tools

1 tool
uplifted_novice_vbl--bluesky-keyword-mention-alertsBluesky keyword, mention, and hashtag monitorAInspect

Run the Apify Bluesky monitor for scheduled keyword, handle, mention, and hashtag alerts. Returns only new public posts by default and can POST matching posts to a webhook.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNoResult ordering. Monitoring uses latest.latest
langsNoOptional ISO 639-1 language codes. Empty means all languages.
handlesNoBluesky handles to monitor, with or without @. Watches their own posts and posts that mention them.
onlyNewNoWhen true, return only posts not previously delivered by this saved Task.
hashtagsNoHashtags to watch, with or without #.
keywordsNoFull-text terms or phrases to watch. Provide at least one keyword, handle, or hashtag.
resetStateNoReset the saved seen-set and cursor once, then turn it off.
webhookUrlNoOptional webhook endpoint that receives a summary and up to 50 newest matched posts.
excludeTermsNoCase-insensitive terms that remove matching posts before delivery and billing.
maxPostsPerRunNoMaximum posts delivered and charged in one run.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (openWorldHint=true, idempotentHint=false, destructiveHint=false) already signal this is not a destructive operation, and the description adds valuable behavior beyond them: the default new-only filter and the webhook POST side effect. Disclosing that it can POST to an external endpoint is exactly the kind of non-obvious behavioral trait an agent needs before invoking.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with zero waste: sentence one names the tool and purpose, sentence two states the default filtering behavior and webhook capability. The most decision-relevant information (new posts only, webhook POST) is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 10-parameter, stateful monitoring tool, the description covers the essential invocation semantics: what runs, the default behavior, and the side-effecting webhook delivery. The return structure beyond 'new public posts' is not detailed and there is no output schema, but the schema's resetState and onlyNew descriptions compensate by explaining the state model (saved Task, seen-set/cursor).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the parameter descriptions are detailed — handle patterns with or without @, excludeTerms removing posts 'before delivery and billing', resetState explaining the saved seen-set and cursor. The tool description itself adds no parameter-level meaning, but with complete schema coverage the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with a specific action ('Run the Apify Bluesky monitor') and names the full watch scope: keyword, handle, mention, and hashtag alerts. It also states two concrete behaviors — returns only new posts by default and can POST to a webhook. With no sibling tools to differentiate from, this is clear and unambiguous, though the verb 'Run' is slightly generic without the resource name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The words 'scheduled' and 'monitor' imply recurring alert usage, and the schema's onlyNew/resetState parameters reinforce that this is a stateful monitoring tool rather than a one-off search. However, there is no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no alternatives exist to be ruled out, so usage context is left to inference.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Search posts, profiles, feeds, threads, and trending topics on Bluesky via MCP. STDIO or Streamable HTTP.
    309
    1
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables interaction with Bluesky social network through the AT Protocol, including searching posts, fetching profiles, browsing feeds, and retrieving threads and follower data.
    6
    MIT
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables searching X (formerly Twitter) using xAI's Responses API with support for filtering by handles, date ranges, and media understanding, returning structured results with citations.
    1
    31
    1
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with another. The tool's purpose is clearly stated, making selection unambiguous.

Naming Consistency4/5

There is only one tool name, so there is no internal inconsistency to evaluate. However, the name itself is verbose and lacks a conventional verb_noun structure, making it less immediately predictable.

Tool Count3/5

A single tool is borderline for a server, though the narrow purpose of keyword alerts could justify it. The tool does appear to encapsulate the core functionality, but the small surface feels thin.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the main alerting workflow: monitoring keywords, handles, mentions, and hashtags, with optional webhook delivery. It lacks explicit management operations like pausing or listing active monitors, but for its stated purpose the surface is mostly complete.