Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Real-time health monitoring and heartbeat tracking for agent services

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
srotzin/hivepulse
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
hivepulse

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    AgentWatch tracks heartbeats, links actions across agents, walks backward from any failure to the root cause, and replays the full sequence to diagnose agent swarm failures.
    64
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Runtime governance for AI-agent fleets that continuously monitors agent health, confidence, and behavior through check-ins, and returns verdicts to enable self-correction before failures occur.
    4
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Multi-machine system monitor with a built-in MCP server that enables AI agents to query health metrics, manage processes, schedule cron jobs, and run diagnostics across local and remote machines.
    133
    Apache 2.0
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: economy metrics, health metrics, population stats, and alert subscriptions. There is no overlap in functionality, and an agent can easily select the correct tool based on the specific data needed.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent 'hivepulse_verb_noun' pattern with snake_case, using 'get' for retrieval and 'subscribe' for notifications. This uniformity makes the tool set predictable and easy to understand.

Tool Count4/5

With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for monitoring a network or system, covering key metrics and alerts. It might benefit from additional tools for configuration or historical data, but the current count is reasonable and focused.

Completeness4/5

The tools provide good coverage for monitoring and alerting in a network domain, including economy, health, population, and subscriptions. Minor gaps exist, such as lack of tools for updating configurations or accessing detailed historical trends, but core workflows are supported.