Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Trust-minimized USDC escrow for autonomous agent transactions

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
srotzin/hive-mcp-escrow
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
hive-mcp-escrow

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Settlement rails for AI labor — USDC escrow on Base Mainnet, 1% protocol fee, designed for autonomous agents. 10 MCP tools covering the full escrow lifecycle: * Quoting calldata for create-intent, submit-proof, release-funds (broadcast gated) * Single-call x402 payment binding (replaces the 5-step x402 dance with one HMAC-signed POST) * Server-side reputation from on-chain event scan * Li
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Non-custodial on-chain escrow + AI arbitration for agent-to-agent USDC payments on Base. Seven tools wrap a verified EscrowV1 contract — create, deliver, confirm, dispute, resolve — with read-only introspection if no wallet key is provided.
    7
    2
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Private escrow for AI agent work on Beam mainnet an agent locks payment, the worker locks collateral, and delivery settles on hash match or review, with M of N arbitrator voting and slashable worker bonds as the dispute backstop. 22 tools cover the full contract lifecycle, and dispute voting is deliberately not an agent tool, so an agent can never rule in its own favour.
    26
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct step in the escrow lifecycle: creation, funding, cancellation, release, and status retrieval. No overlap in purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_escrow, fund_escrow). The deviation in get_escrow_status is minor and still clearly follows the convention.

Tool Count5/5

Five tools is ideal for an escrow service, covering all essential actions without unnecessary complexity. The scope is well-matched.

Completeness4/5

Covers the full lifecycle (create, fund, cancel, release, status). Minor gaps like a refund or dispute mechanism are absent but not critical for a basic escrow on Base USDC.