Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Per-agent rate limits and quota enforcement for the Hive A2A economy

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
srotzin/hive-mcp-agent-quota
GitHub Stars
0
Server Listing
hive-mcp-agent-quota

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    Runtime budget authority for autonomous agents - a set of tools to check, reserve, spend, and release budget before and after every costly, risky operation. The agent asks "can I afford this?" before acting, and reports what it actually used afterward.
    9
    92
    Apache 2.0
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Budget & cost control for AI agents: hard per-agent spend caps, rate limits, idempotency, and human-in-the-loop approval — enforced before each LLM call, not after the invoice. One hosted MCP endpoint (no proxy or self-hosting), settled via x402 (USDC on Base).
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Multi-agent swarm orchestrator for AI workflows. Exposes blackboard read/write, agent dispatch, permission gating (AuthGuardian), token budget enforcement (FederatedBudget), and audit log tools over MCP. Supports 14 AI framework adapters including LangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, Codex, and A2A — mix any frameworks in one swarm with race-condition-safe shared state.(Traffic light for agents)
    24
    518
    72
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct operation: reading balance, consuming quota, and estimating top-up cost. Descriptions clearly differentiate them with no overlap.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tool names follow a consistent 'quota_' prefix with snake_case (balance, check, topup_estimate), making the naming pattern predictable and uniform.

Tool Count4/5

With only 3 tools, the server is on the lower end but still covers the essential quota management actions. The scope is minimal yet reasonable.

Completeness2/5

The server lacks a tool to actually execute a top-up or purchase quota. Users must estimate cost externally but cannot complete the transaction via the tool set, leaving a significant gap.