Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Guardrailed FHIR access for AI agents: PHI redaction, audit trail, step-up auth, tenant isolation

If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership with GitHub, an HTTP challenge, or a DNS record. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL
Repository
aks129/HealthClawGuardrails
GitHub Stars
30
Server Listing
HealthClawGuardrails

Frequently Asked Questions

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Connectors

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables LLMs to securely interact with FHIR healthcare servers and HL7 terminology services. Provides comprehensive healthcare data operations with built-in PHI protection, audit logging, and SMART on FHIR authentication.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Enables LLM-based agents to interact with FHIR healthcare data through natural language prompts, providing full CRUD operations on FHIR resources, document processing, and semantic search capabilities.
    13
    98
    MIT
Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, with explicit descriptions that avoid overlap. The action_*, curatr_*, fhir_*, questionnaire_*, shl_*, sources_*, and wearables_* groups each cover unique functionality without ambiguity.

Naming Consistency3/5

The naming follows a consistent prefix pattern (e.g., fhir_, curatr_), but within the fhir_ group there is inconsistency: some use verbs (read, search), others use nouns (stats, lastn, compiled_truth). This mix can cause slight confusion.

Tool Count4/5

With 24 tools, the set is comprehensive for a health data guardrail server, covering FHIR operations, data quality, actions, questionnaires, SHL generation, and external source checks. The count is high but justified by the domain's complexity.

Completeness4/5

The tool set covers core operations: read, search, write (propose/commit), validate, statistics, lab interpretation, permission evaluation, data quality fixes, actions, questionnaires, SHL, and source checking. Missing explicit delete or update operations, but writing may encompass updates, and deletions may be out of scope.