Skip to main content
Glama

Support Case Workbench

Server Details

Add a support case follow-up

Status
Unhealthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.6/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The agent will always select this tool when needed.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern ('add_ticket_comment'), which is consistent and descriptive. No conflicts exist.

Tool Count1/5

A support case workbench typically requires multiple operations (create, update, list, delete cases), but only one tool is provided, making it severely inadequate for the domain.

Completeness1/5

Only a single 'add comment' tool exists, while essential operations like creating, updating, or viewing cases are missing, leaving the surface incomplete for meaningful workflow.

Available Tools

1 tool
add_ticket_commentSupport Case WorkbenchAInspect

Adds concise follow-up notes to a support case workbench used for escalation handoff and customer-status tracking.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
commentYesSupport case comment or escalation note to add.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states the action (adds notes) without mentioning side effects, permissions, idempotency, or if the action is reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single well-structured sentence that is front-loaded and contains no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides sufficient context about the workbench's purpose. However, it omits details like length limits, whether comments are appended, or if there are any constraints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, yet the description adds value by specifying that comments should be 'concise follow-up notes' for 'escalation handoff and customer-status tracking,' which goes beyond the schema's 'Support case comment or escalation note to add.'

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies a verb ('Adds') and resource ('follow-up notes to a support case workbench') with scope ('escalation handoff and customer-status tracking'), making the tool's purpose clear and distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over alternatives or any prerequisites. The description lacks when/why/alternatives context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources