Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

x402-gated safety checker for npm/PyPI packages before you npm install / pip install.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so there is no ambiguity. The tool has a clear and distinct purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'check_package_safety' follows a clear verb_noun pattern, which is consistent.

Tool Count3/5

With only one tool, the server is extremely minimal. While it serves a specific niche, it lacks scope for broader workflows, making it borderline.

Completeness2/5

The server only provides a single safety check operation. Missing related functionalities like batch checking, detailed reporting, or package metadata retrieval leaves significant gaps for typical usage.

Available Tools

1 tool
check_package_safetyAInspect

Check whether an npm or PyPI package is safe to install. Costs $0.005 USDC via x402 per call.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesExact package name to check for safety before installing
ecosystemYesPackage ecosystem to check
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It discloses cost but fails to explain what 'safety' means (e.g., vulnerabilities, malware), how the check works, or what happens if unsafe. The description lacks critical behavioral details.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences efficiently convey purpose and cost. No extraneous information, front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema or siblings are present, putting the burden on the description. It covers core purpose and cost but omits details like return format, safety criteria, and response time. Adequate but with clear gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema's parameter descriptions, which already define the package name and ecosystem.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool checks whether an npm or PyPI package is safe to install, with specific verb and resource. No sibling tools exist, so differentiation is not needed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use (before installing) and mentions cost, but does not exclude any scenarios or list alternatives. Since there are no sibling tools, the guidance is sufficient.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources