F
licenseA
qualityD
maintenanceEnables searching arXiv papers by topic or category, retrieving full text, PDFs, and BibTeX citations, and generating structured reviews and comparisons.
6
-
AgentDiet ArXiv AI/CS Paper Search & Structured Token-Diet Digest
Server Details
Queries ArXiv for AI/CS/math papers and returns structured abstracts, authors, PDF links, and Bib.
Ownership verified
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
TDQS
A4.7/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: one fetches ArXiv papers and generates a digest, the other checks wallet status. No overlap or ambiguity exists between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern (fetch_arxiv_research_digest and get_agent_wallet_status), with clear action verbs and no mixed conventions.
Tool Count4/5
Only 2 tools, which is slightly under the typical 3-15 range, but each tool earns its place: one core function (paper search/digest) and one necessary billing check. Given the narrow scope, it's reasonable.
Completeness5/5
The server covers its core purpose (ArXiv paper search and digest) and includes wallet management for paid execution. No obvious missing operations for a read-only search service.
Available Tools
2 toolsfetch_arxiv_research_digestARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Queries ArXiv for AI/CS/math papers and returns structured abstracts, authors, PDF links, and BibTeX. WHEN TO USE: Call fetch_arxiv_research_digest when your task requires deterministic arxiv-digest analysis for query; use get_agent_wallet_status to check your remaining free trial quota or prepaid balance. WHEN NOT TO USE: Do not use for unrelated domains or binary media. PARAMETER INTERACTIONS: Pass the target query as a non-empty string; omit agent_id and tx_hash during your 5 free trial calls, or supply agent_id (agd_pass_...) / tx_hash for paid execution. Read-only and idempotent; results are cached for 1 hour (<5ms cache hit). $0.01 per call. Pricing: the first 5 calls per agent_id are free and failed calls are never charged. After 5 calls, the tool returns a payment-required quote (not a fatal error) with a $2 Stripe top-up link and Base/Solana USDC addresses; complete payment, then retry with your agd_pass_ key in agent_id or pass tx_hash. Example: fetch_arxiv_research_digest(query='example')
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ArXiv paper ID (e.g. 2308.11432) or research topic search query. | |
| tx_hash | No | Optional on-chain Base Mainnet (0x...) or Solana SPL USDC transaction hash. Omit unless settling an individual call directly on-chain instead of using an agd_pass_ key in agent_id. | |
| agent_id | No | Optional agent identifier or prepaid agd_pass_ session key. Omit during your 5 free trial calls to use an ID automatically derived from your client IP, or pass your agd_pass_ key after topping up. |
Output Schema
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | No | Structured tool output payload. |
| status | Yes | Execution status ('ok' or 'payment_required'). |
| roi_proof | No | Token compression and cost-savings verification metrics. |
TDQS
A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, but the description adds substantial behavior beyond them: 1-hour result caching with <5ms hits, $0.01 pricing, first 5 calls free per agent_id, failed calls never charged, and the non-fatal payment-required quote flow with retry instructions. This payment/quota lifecycle is exactly the kind of context annotations cannot express.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness4/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Purpose is front-loaded and the WHEN/PARAMETER sections are scannable, but the pricing story is stated twice ('$0.01 per call' and then a full 'Pricing:' sentence repeating the free-trial and failure-charge rules). Slight redundancy keeps it from a 5.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness5/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists so return values need not be re-explained, yet the description still covers the payment-required error path, quota model, caching, and per-parameter conditions. For a tool with a paid gating flow, nothing an agent needs to invoke or retry it is missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters4/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; the description goes further by explaining the conditional interaction between agent_id and tx_hash (omit during free trials, supply agd_pass_ or tx_hash for paid execution). It also reinforces that query is a non-empty string, though that is already in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Opens with a specific verb (Queries) plus resource (ArXiv for AI/CS/math papers) and enumerates the returned artifacts (abstracts, authors, PDF links, BibTeX). This is unmistakably distinct from the only sibling, get_agent_wallet_status, which is a wallet/quota tool.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines5/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Has explicit WHEN TO USE and WHEN NOT TO USE sections, names the alternative tool (get_agent_wallet_status) for quota checking, and excludes unrelated domains/binary media. An agent needs no inference to pick correctly.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
get_agent_wallet_statusARead-onlyIdempotentInspect
Inspect an agent's account ledger: remaining free trial calls (out of 5), prepaid USD balance, cumulative spend, total API calls, and total LLM tokens saved. WHEN TO USE: Call before a batch of paid tool executions or after completing a Stripe or USDC top-up to confirm your balance. WHEN NOT TO USE: Do not use to process web content, execute marketplace tools, or submit payments; use the other tools on this server for execution. PARAMETER INTERACTIONS: Omit agent_id to inspect the default trial account derived from your client IP, or pass your explicit agent_id or agd_pass_ session key to check a specific funded wallet. Free and read-only: never charges a fee or consumes a free trial call. Example: get_agent_wallet_status(agent_id='example')
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_id | No | Optional Agent ID or agd_pass_ session key to inspect. Omit to check the default wallet derived from your client IP. |
Output Schema
ParametersJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|
| data | No | Structured tool output payload. |
| status | Yes | Execution status ('ok' or 'payment_required'). |
| roi_proof | No | Token compression and cost-savings verification metrics. |
TDQS
A4.6/5.0
Behavior4/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds real context beyond that: it never charges a fee or consumes a free trial call, and the default wallet is derived from the caller's client IP. It does not discuss rate limits or caching, but the cost/free-trial guarantee is meaningful behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness4/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Front-loaded with the ledger contents, then structured WHEN TO USE / WHEN NOT TO USE / PARAMETER INTERACTIONS / Example. The labeled sections make it scannable, though the repetition of the read-only guarantee and the worked example add a little bulk.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness5/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return-value detail is optional, yet the description still names the key fields. With a single optional parameter, no nested objects, and annotations covering safety, an agent has everything needed to invoke it correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters4/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description goes slightly further by naming the agd_pass_ session-key form and framing the two modes as an interaction (omit for IP-derived trial account vs. pass explicit agent_id/session key for a funded wallet), which aids selection even though the schema states the omit behavior.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States a specific verb (inspect) and resource (agent's account ledger) and enumerates exactly what is returned: trial calls out of 5, prepaid USD balance, cumulative spend, total API calls, tokens saved. This clearly separates it from the sibling web-content tools (distill_webpage, extract_structured_data, recon_webpage_skeleton), which operate on webpages rather than wallet state.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines5/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Explicit WHEN TO USE (before paid tool batches, after a Stripe or USDC top-up) and WHEN NOT TO USE (not for processing web content, executing marketplace tools, or submitting payments). The exclusion clause routes the agent back to the other server tools for execution, so the alternative is named.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
2 tool updates
- First observed
fetch_arxiv_research_digest - First observed
get_agent_wallet_status
Related MCP Connectors
Queries ArXiv for AI/CS/math papers and returns structured abstracts, authors, PDF links, and BibT
Extract papers from ArXiv — titles, abstracts, authors, categories & PDF links. Monitor new AI, phys
Search arXiv, fetch paper metadata, and read full-text content.
Search arXiv/Semantic Scholar/OpenAlex + medical evidence (PubMed/Europe PMC) + LaTeX/PDF tools.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides search functionality for arXiv.org papers through the official arXiv API, allowing users to search papers by keywords, filter by subject categories and date ranges, and receive comprehensive metadata including PDF links.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying and discovering the latest arXiv papers by category or keyword, providing structured metadata including titles, authors, summaries, and links for research assistance and literature review workflows.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables searching, retrieving, and parsing academic papers from arXiv, including keyword search, PDF downloads, content extraction from HTML/PDF formats, and accessing the latest AI research papers.410 npmMIT
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.