AgentDiet ArXiv AI/CS Paper Search & Structured Token-Diet Digest

fetch_arxiv_research_digest

Read-onlyIdempotent

Queries ArXiv for AI/CS/math papers and returns structured abstracts, authors, PDF links, and BibTeX. WHEN TO USE: Call fetch_arxiv_research_digest when your task requires deterministic arxiv-digest analysis for query; use get_agent_wallet_status to check your remaining free trial quota or prepaid balance. WHEN NOT TO USE: Do not use for unrelated domains or binary media. PARAMETER INTERACTIONS: Pass the target query as a non-empty string; omit agent_id and tx_hash during your 5 free trial calls, or supply agent_id (agd_pass_...) / tx_hash for paid execution. Read-only and idempotent; results are cached for 1 hour (<5ms cache hit). $0.01 per call. Pricing: the first 5 calls per agent_id are free and failed calls are never charged. After 5 calls, the tool returns a payment-required quote (not a fatal error) with a $2 Stripe top-up link and Base/Solana USDC addresses; complete payment, then retry with your agd_pass_ key in agent_id or pass tx_hash. Example: fetch_arxiv_research_digest(query='example')

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`query`	Yes	ArXiv paper ID (e.g. 2308.11432) or research topic search query.
`tx_hash`	No	Optional on-chain Base Mainnet (0x...) or Solana SPL USDC transaction hash. Omit unless settling an individual call directly on-chain instead of using an agd_pass_ key in agent_id.
`agent_id`	No	Optional agent identifier or prepaid agd_pass_ session key. Omit during your 5 free trial calls to use an ID automatically derived from your client IP, or pass your agd_pass_ key after topping up.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`data`	No	Structured tool output payload.
`status`	Yes	Execution status ('ok' or 'payment_required').
`roi_proof`	No	Token compression and cost-savings verification metrics.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedOct 19, 2026

TDQS

A4.8/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare read-only/idempotent/non-destructive, but the description adds substantial behavior beyond them: 1-hour result caching with <5ms hits, $0.01 pricing, first 5 calls free per agent_id, failed calls never charged, and the non-fatal payment-required quote flow with retry instructions. This payment/quota lifecycle is exactly the kind of context annotations cannot express.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded and the WHEN/PARAMETER sections are scannable, but the pricing story is stated twice ('$0.01 per call' and then a full 'Pricing:' sentence repeating the free-trial and failure-charge rules). Slight redundancy keeps it from a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values need not be re-explained, yet the description still covers the payment-required error path, quota model, caching, and per-parameter conditions. For a tool with a paid gating flow, nothing an agent needs to invoke or retry it is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3; the description goes further by explaining the conditional interaction between agent_id and tx_hash (omit during free trials, supply agd_pass_ or tx_hash for paid execution). It also reinforces that query is a non-empty string, though that is already in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Opens with a specific verb (Queries) plus resource (ArXiv for AI/CS/math papers) and enumerates the returned artifacts (abstracts, authors, PDF links, BibTeX). This is unmistakably distinct from the only sibling, get_agent_wallet_status, which is a wallet/quota tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Has explicit WHEN TO USE and WHEN NOT TO USE sections, names the alternative tool (get_agent_wallet_status) for quota checking, and excludes unrelated domains/binary media. An agent needs no inference to pick correctly.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All AgentDiet ArXiv AI/CS Paper Search & Structured Token-Diet Digest tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?