Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate whether an IP address belongs to SeznamBot. Remote MCP server exposing a validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.8/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

Only one tool exists, so no ambiguity with any other tool.

Naming Consistency5/5

Single tool with a clear and appropriate name, consistent in style.

Tool Count5/5

One tool is perfectly scoped for the narrow purpose of validating SeznamBot IPs.

Completeness5/5

The single tool fully covers the server's stated purpose with no obvious missing functionality.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate SeznamBot IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine SeznamBot IP address, verified against SeznamBot's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden. It discloses the verification source (seoapi.com) and IP types supported, but lacks details on rate limits, caching, error handling, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that effectively communicates the tool's purpose without any extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple input (1 parameter, no output schema) and no sibling tools, the description adequately covers the tool's behavior. It could mention the return value type, but the purpose is clear.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% as the 'ip' parameter has a description. The tool description adds minimal value beyond the schema; it reiterates IPv4/IPv6 support already present in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool validates IPv4 or IPv6 addresses against SeznamBot's published IP data. The verb 'Check' and resource 'IP address' are specific, and the tool's unique purpose is well-defined with no sibling ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for verifying SeznamBot IPs but provides no explicit guidance on when to use or avoid this tool, nor any mention of alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources