Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Validate whether an IP address belongs to Googlebot. Remote MCP server exposing a validate_ip tool.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.5/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools. The agent can unambiguously select this tool for its specific purpose.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name 'validate_ip' follows a clear verb_noun pattern and is consistent within the set. No other tools exist to create inconsistency.

Tool Count3/5

At one tool, the server is at the lower boundary of reasonable scope. While it serves a focused purpose, it offers very little surface area for an agent, making it borderline thin.

Completeness5/5

For the narrow domain of verifying Googlebot IP addresses, a single validation tool is complete. There are no obvious missing operations for this specific task.

Available Tools

1 tool
validate_ipValidate Googlebot IPAInspect

Check whether an IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Googlebot IP address, verified against Googlebot's published IP data on seoapi.com.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ipYesThe IPv4 or IPv6 address to validate
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses verification against Googlebot's published IP data externally, but does not mention potential network latency, authentication requirements, or error handling. Behavior is minimally transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is concise, front-loaded with the action, and free of extraneous words. Every part earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, no output schema), the description is adequate but lacks details on return values or error cases. An agent would benefit from knowing the output format.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The parameter 'ip' is well-described in the schema. The tool description adds no additional semantic meaning beyond what is in the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Check' and the specific resource 'IP address (IPv4 or IPv6) is a genuine Googlebot IP address'. It is highly specific and leaves no ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no context on prerequisites, and no exclusions. The absence of sibling tools reduces the need for differentiation, but still lacks usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

  • A
    license
    -
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    MCP server providing IP address lookup capabilities. Enables AI assistants to fetch details about public IP addresses or the user's current device IP.
    98
    ISC
  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides access to the Netdetective API for querying information about IP addresses. It enables users to retrieve metadata for a specified IP address or the connecting client's default IP address.
    1
    MIT

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources