hush
Server Details
A secret store for AI agents: the agent never sees the plaintext.
- Status
- Healthy
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP
- URL
- Repository
- royashbrook/hush
- GitHub Stars
- 17
Tool Definition Quality
Average 3.7/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The single tool 'get_skill' has a unique and clear purpose.
The tool name 'get_skill' follows a consistent verb_noun pattern. While a single tool limits pattern assessment, the naming is clear and predictable.
The server has only one tool, which is too few for its apparent purpose of installing and using 'hush'. A single informational tool is insufficient for a functional server.
The tool only retrieves a playbook but does not include tools for actual installation, usage, or other common operations. This leaves a significant gap in the tool surface.
Available Tools
1 toolget_skillAInspect
Get the full SKILL.md playbook for hush so you can install + use it.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No parameters | |||
Tool Definition Quality
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states 'Get' implying a read operation, but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, authentication requirements, or rate limits. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the obvious.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence that efficiently conveys the tool's purpose and desired outcome with no extraneous information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations, no output schema, and zero parameters, the description minimally covers the tool's behavior. It identifies the resource and purpose but does not explain the return format or any additional context. For a simple retrieval tool, it is adequate but not thorough.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The tool has zero parameters, and schema coverage is trivially 100%. Per the baseline rule for 0 parameters, a score of 4 is appropriate. The description does not need to add parameter meaning.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Get' and the specific resource 'full SKILL.md playbook for hush', with an explicit purpose 'so you can install + use it'. No ambiguity or tautology.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when one wants to install or use hush, but does not provide explicit when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternatives. Since there are no sibling tools, lack of alternatives is acceptable, but usage context remains implicit.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Frequently Asked Questions
Claiming proves that you control a remote MCP connector. It does not move, proxy, or interrupt the server.
Open the connector listing, choose Claim ownership, and sign in to Glama.
Complete one verification method:
GitHub identity — fastest for official registry listings. For a namespace such as
io.github.alice/server, link the matching GitHub user or an account that owns the GitHub organization, then choose Claim with GitHub.HTTP challenge — works when you can deploy a public file. Generate a token, publish the exact JSON Glama shows at
/.well-known/glama.jsonon the same origin as the connector, then choose Check HTTP challenge.DNS challenge — works when you control DNS but cannot change the server. Generate a token, create the exact TXT record Glama shows, wait for it to propagate, then choose Check DNS challenge.
After verification, Glama sends a confirmation email and gives you access to listing details, thumbnails, health checks, and analytics. Keep the HTTP file or DNS record in place: Glama periodically checks it and ownership remains verified while the token is discoverable.
The HTTP ownership file has this structure:
{
"$schema": "https://glama.ai/mcp/schemas/connector.json",
"claim": "glama_claim_..."
}Claim tokens are opaque, stable, and bound to the signed-in Glama account. They contain no email address or other personal information. If Glama can no longer discover a verified HTTP or DNS token, it starts a seven-day grace period before removing claim-based access. Restore the same token during that period to keep ownership verified. Never publish an email address, Glama session token, GitHub token, or connector credential as ownership proof.
If verification fails, confirm that you copied the current token exactly. The HTTP file must be public, return valid JSON with a successful HTTP response, and stay on the connector's origin. DNS changes may need more time to propagate. A claim cannot transfer to a different origin or hostname: if the connector target changes, Glama starts the grace period and the new target must be claimed separately after the previous claim is released.
For a connector linked to the official MCP Registry, registry updates continue to replace its name, description, and URL by default. After claiming, open Manage connector and enable Use Glama listing details as the source of truth if edits made on Glama should be preserved. Categories and thumbnails are always managed on Glama; registry linkage and technical connection settings continue to sync.
Control your server's listing on Glama, including description and metadata
Access analytics and receive server usage reports
Get monitoring and health status updates for your server
Feature your server to boost visibility and reach more users
To improve your MCP server's ranking:
Claim ownership of the server listing
Complete the server profile with an accurate description and thumbnail
Provide a test profile so Glama can connect to and evaluate the server
Keep tool definitions clear and complete to earn a high Tool Definition Quality Score (TDQS)
Route real usage through the Glama Gateway; more recorded successful server uses also improve the ranking
For users:
Full audit trail – every tool call is logged with inputs and outputs for compliance and debugging
Granular tool control – enable or disable individual tools per connector to limit what your AI agents can do
Centralized credential management – store and rotate API keys and OAuth tokens in one place
Change alerts – get notified when a connector changes its schema, adds or removes tools, or updates tool definitions, so nothing breaks silently
For server owners:
Proven adoption – public usage metrics on your listing show real-world traction and build trust with prospective users
Tool-level analytics – see which tools are being used most, helping you prioritize development and documentation
Direct user feedback – users can report issues and suggest improvements through the listing, giving you a channel you would not have otherwise
The connector status is unhealthy when Glama is unable to successfully connect to the server. This can happen for several reasons:
The server is experiencing an outage
The URL of the server is wrong
Credentials required to access the server are missing or invalid
If you are the owner of this MCP connector and would like to make modifications to the listing, including providing test credentials for accessing the server, please contact support@glama.ai.
Discussions
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!
Related MCP Connectors
Encrypted secret store and rotation for autonomous agent credentials
Secrets for developers and agents—secure context and workflows without exposing secret values.
Protect AI agents from API-key exposure with secretless credentials and signed execution proofs.
Encrypted A2A object storage for autonomous agent state and artifacts
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely store and manage encrypted secrets locally while using them indirectly through environment-variable injection or file writes, so plaintext values never enter the agent's context.8MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceShare encrypted, self-destructing secrets from your AI agent. Zero-knowledge E2E encryption. Agent-blind input sources (env:, file:, dotenv:) keep secrets out of LLM context.4201MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceLocal AES-256-GCM encrypted vault for AI agents. Resolve {{PLACEHOLDER}} secrets in prompts at runtime — LLMs never see real API keys. Argon2id key derivation, zero cloud.2842MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to securely use credentials like passwords and API keys without exposing them in the context window, through encrypted storage and proxy-based injection.111MIT