A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceAn AI accountability system that tracks what AI systems claim they will implement versus what they actually deliver, helping to reduce the gap between promises and reality.
3
20 npm
10
MIT
coherence-signal
Server Details
A brand's claim (website coherence) vs its reality (recent news), and the divergence.
If you are the author of this connector, you can claim ownership by verifying the domain or GitHub account it belongs to. Claimed connector authors can inspect health checks, view analytics, and manage their listing.
- Status
- Healthy
- Uptime
- 100.0% over the last 24 hours
- Last Tested
- Transport
- Streamable HTTP · MCP 2025-11-25
- URL
- ChatGPT
- –
- Claude
- –
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 2 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Both tools have clearly distinct purposes: one compares multiple brands side by side, the other retrieves detailed coherence data for a single brand. There is no ambiguity between them.
Naming Consistency5/5
Both tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case: 'compare_brands' and 'get_brand_coherence'. The naming is predictable and uniform.
Tool Count3/5
With only two tools, the server feels minimal. While it covers basic retrieval and comparison, additional tools for scanning brands or managing data would justify a broader scope.
Completeness2/5
The server lacks essential tools for creating or updating brand coherence data. There is no apparent way to scan a new brand, leaving the 'no read on file' message as a dead end.
Available Tools
2 toolscompare_brandsAInspect
Compare the NES coherence signal for several brands side by side (claim, reality, divergence for each). Presents the data; it does NOT recommend one brand over another. The caller decides.
Inputs: urls (required). Returns: brands
get_brand_coherenceAInspect
Get the NES claim-vs-reality coherence signal for one brand: its website coherence score (the claim), recent public reality (matched news events), and the divergence between them. High divergence means the brand presents as coherent while its reality is turning negative. Directional opinion from public signal; not a fraud or financial check. Returns 'no read on file' for brands never scanned.
Inputs: url, brand. Returns: brand, claim, reality, divergence
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
Related MCP Connectors
Fact-check claims against live web sources: verbatim evidence, coherence-gated verdict.
Askline shows what ChatGPT says about a brand, then the SEO that feeds it.
Cross-company earnings trends & executive divergence with citable sources.
USDA NOP organic compliance checks — operation websites vs live OID certificate data.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceSearch URDB's product integrity database — integrity scores, enshittification events, warranty cuts, and material downgrades across consumer products. Sourced and evidence-backed.443 npm2MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAutonomous cross-source inconsistency and contradiction intelligence engine for AI agents. Detects specification drift, SemVer conflicts, and infrastructure mismatches across code, docs, and deployments.1210MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceFirst-line incident triage you can trust: ranked root-cause hypotheses where every claim cites a real evidence handle — and the agent abstains rather than guess.11MIT
Try in Browser
One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.