Skip to main content
Glama

state-transfer-tracker

Server Details

Whiteout Survival State Transfer tracker: phase dates, active status, remaining pass chances.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 3.8/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceA
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap with other tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

Single tool follows a descriptive verb-noun pattern, no inconsistency.

Tool Count5/5

One tool is appropriate for a focused tracker that retrieves upcoming state transfer details.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the primary need of fetching current/next state transfer info; minor gaps like historical data may exist but are not essential.

Available Tools

1 tool
get_upcoming_state_transferAInspect

Returns the current or next upcoming State Transfer event for Whiteout Survival: dates for the three transfer phases (power cap setup, invitations, transfer passes), whether the transfer is currently active, and how many weekly chances remain to buy a Transfer Pass from the Alliance Shop before the transfer date. Dates are in UTC, formatted as "Year/Month/Day" (e.g. "2026/07/19"). transferDate is a "Month Year" label identifying the transfer window (e.g. "July 2026").

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only mentions that dates are in UTC format but omits details like idempotency, data freshness, side effects, or required permissions, leaving significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single paragraph that front-loads the main purpose and covers all return fields. While it is relatively detailed, every sentence adds value, and the structure is clear. It could be slightly more concise, but it is not verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description fully explains the return values: three phase dates, active status, weekly chances, and date format. This is complete for a simple tool with no parameters, as all necessary context is provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and schema coverage is trivially 100%. Per guidelines, 0 parameters yields a baseline of 4. The description adds no parameter information since none exist.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns the current or next upcoming State Transfer event for Whiteout Survival, specifying the three transfer phases, active status, and weekly chances. The verb 'Returns' and the specific resource 'State Transfer event' make the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains what the tool returns but does not provide guidance on when to use it, such as typical use cases or prerequisites. Since there are no sibling tools, differentiation is less critical, but explicit usage context would improve the score.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources