Skip to main content
Glama

Server Details

Cricket travel specialist. Search tours, destinations, schedules, and submit enquiries.

Status
Healthy
Last Tested
Transport
Streamable HTTP
URL

Glama MCP Gateway

Connect through Glama MCP Gateway for full control over tool access and complete visibility into every call.

MCP client
Glama
MCP server

Full call logging

Every tool call is logged with complete inputs and outputs, so you can debug issues and audit what your agents are doing.

Tool access control

Enable or disable individual tools per connector, so you decide what your agents can and cannot do.

Managed credentials

Glama handles OAuth flows, token storage, and automatic rotation, so credentials never expire on your clients.

Usage analytics

See which tools your agents call, how often, and when, so you can understand usage patterns and catch anomalies.

100% free. Your data is private.
Tool DescriptionsA

Average 4.9/5 across 1 of 1 tools scored.

Server CoherenceB
Disambiguation5/5

With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion. The tool's purpose is clear and distinct by default.

Naming Consistency5/5

A single tool follows a simple verb-noun convention (get_about). With only one tool, there is no room for inconsistency.

Tool Count2/5

The server is named 'cricket-travel' and ostensibly covers a travel service domain, yet it exposes only a single informational tool. This feels far too sparse for the apparent scope, warranting a low score.

Completeness1/5

As a cricket travel service, one would expect tools for browsing tours, booking, managing itineraries, or contacting support. The lone 'get_about' tool leaves the tool surface severely incomplete and unlikely to support agent workflows.

Available Tools

1 tool
get_aboutAInspect

Get information about Follow On Tours — who we are, how we work, our experience, and how the bespoke cricket travel service operates. Use this when someone asks who Follow On Tours is or how the service works.

ParametersJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No parameters

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It states the tool is a read-only information retrieval ('Get information') and details exactly which information is covered, leaving no ambiguity about side effects or scope.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences: the first front-loads the purpose and scope, the second gives explicit usage guidance. Every sentence earns its place with no fluff or redundancy, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters, no output schema, and no siblings, this description is fully complete. It covers what the tool does, what content it returns, and when to use it. There are no missing elements needed for the agent to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the schema is fully covered by default. The description doesn't need to explain parameter meanings, and it doesn't, which is appropriate. The baseline of 4 for parameterless tools applies here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Get information about Follow On Tours' and specifies the scope (who we are, how we work, experience, service operating). The verb 'Get information' plus the specific resource 'Follow On Tours' makes the purpose unambiguous, even without siblings to differentiate from.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly provides usage context: 'Use this when someone asks who Follow On Tours is or how the service works.' This directly tells the agent when to invoke the tool, and since there are no sibling tools, no alternative exclusions are needed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Discussions

No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion!

Related MCP Servers

View all MCP Servers

Try in Browser

Your Connectors

Sign in to create a connector for this server.

Resources